How many SH3 forum members does it take?

GoldenRivet · 07-12-08, 01:37 PM

How many SH3 forum members does it takes to sink a freighter?

1 to sink the freighter and to post that the freighter has been sunk

14 to share similar experiences of sinking freighters and how the freighter could have been sunk differently

7 to caution about the dangers of attacking such freighters in various years of the war

7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in the original post about sinking the freighter

5 to flame the spell checkers

3 to correct spelling/grammar flames

6 to argue over whether it's "freighter" or "frachter" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid

2 old salty navy retirees to inform the group that the proper term is "Liberty Ship"

15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the Merchant Marines, and that "liberty ship" is NOT correct... it was a "victory cargo"

19 to post that this forum is not about "Ship classes" and to please take this discussion to the general discussion forum

11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all encounter freighters in SH3 and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum

36 to debate which method of attacking freighters is superior, where to aim for the best results, what pistol type works best for the given type of freighter and what method of approach is best

7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different freighters

4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's

13 to quote the longest post in its entirety including all headers and signatures, and add something like the phrase "Me too"

5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the controversy

4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

13 to say "read the GWX manual before posting questions about sinking freighters in GWX"

and finally

1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 18 months from now and start it all over again.

:rotfl:

von hally · 07-12-08, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldenRivet

1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 18 months from now and start it all over again.

:rotfl:

lol:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

UnderseaLcpl · 07-12-08, 02:07 PM

LOL!

This is totally untrue. I can easily cover 5 or 6 of those roles.

KeptinCranky · 07-12-08, 02:12 PM

Sure, but can you do so in a single post?.... :hmm:

:rotfl:

Jimbuna · 07-12-08, 02:14 PM

Nice one

Mikhayl · 07-12-08, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldenRivet

How many SH3 forum members does it takes to sink a freighter?

1 to sink the freighter and to post that the freighter has been sunk

14 to share similar experiences of sinking freighters and how the freighter could have been sunk differently

7 to caution about the dangers of attacking such freighters in various years of the war

7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in the original post about sinking the freighter

5 to flame the spell checkers

3 to correct spelling/grammar flames

6 to argue over whether it's "freighter" or "frachter" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid

2 old salty navy retirees to inform the group that the proper term is "Liberty Ship"

15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the Merchant Marines, and that "liberty ship" is NOT correct... it was a "victory cargo"

19 to post that this forum is not about "Ship classes" and to please take this discussion to the general discussion forum

11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all encounter freighters in SH3 and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum

36 to debate which method of attacking freighters is superior, where to aim for the best results, what pistol type works best for the given type of freighter and what method of approach is best

7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different freighters

4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's

13 to quote the longest post in its entirety including all headers and signatures, and add something like the phrase "Me too"

5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the controversy

4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

13 to say "read the GWX manual before posting questions about sinking freighters in GWX"

and finally

1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 18 months from now and start it all over again.

:rotfl:

Great one.

STEED · 07-12-08, 03:16 PM

That Is So..............................................

STEED · 07-12-08, 03:17 PM

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Mush Martin · 07-12-08, 03:19 PM

:rotfl:

nikimcbee · 07-13-08, 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by STEED

That Is So..............................................

is ond so don't need to be cpaitalized.

07-13-08, 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikimcbee

Quote:

Originally Posted by STEED

That Is So..............................................

is ond so don't need to be cpaitalized.

ond and cpaitalized need to be spelled right

:rotfl:

Frank0001 · 07-13-08, 08:47 AM

You forgot to add a dot after your sentence.

Okay, that were the three spellcheckers, we can now continue to discuss wether it's 'freighter' or 'frachter'. :rotfl:

nikimcbee · 07-13-08, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reise

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikimcbee

Quote:

Originally Posted by STEED

That Is So..............................................

is ond so don't need to be cpaitalized.

ond and cpaitalized need to be spelled right

:rotfl:

Ja, I have over 60 books on the Englisch language, I suggest that you look at one!
Here!

Harumph!

Sailor Steve · 07-12-08, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikhayl

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldenRivet

How many SH3 forum members does it takes to sink a freighter?

1 to sink the freighter and to post that the freighter has been sunk

14 to share similar experiences of sinking freighters and how the freighter could have been sunk differently

7 to caution about the dangers of attacking such freighters in various years of the war

7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in the original post about sinking the freighter

5 to flame the spell checkers

3 to correct spelling/grammar flames

6 to argue over whether it's "freighter" or "frachter" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid

2 old salty navy retirees to inform the group that the proper term is "Liberty Ship"

15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the Merchant Marines, and that "liberty ship" is NOT correct... it was a "victory cargo"

19 to post that this forum is not about "Ship classes" and to please take this discussion to the general discussion forum

11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all encounter freighters in SH3 and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum

36 to debate which method of attacking freighters is superior, where to aim for the best results, what pistol type works best for the given type of freighter and what method of approach is best

7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different freighters

4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's

13 to quote the longest post in its entirety including all headers and signatures, and add something like the phrase "Me too"

5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the controversy

4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

13 to say "read the GWX manual before posting questions about sinking freighters in GWX"

and finally

1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 18 months from now and start it all over again.

:rotfl:

Great one.

Me too.
:rotfl:

Jimbuna · 07-12-08, 05:50 PM

I think you meant "me three"

07-12-08, 01:37 PM	#1
GoldenRivet Subsim Aviator Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Texas Posts: 8,726 Downloads: 146 Uploads: 0	How many SH3 forum members does it take? How many SH3 forum members does it takes to sink a freighter? 1 to sink the freighter and to post that the freighter has been sunk 14 to share similar experiences of sinking freighters and how the freighter could have been sunk differently 7 to caution about the dangers of attacking such freighters in various years of the war 7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in the original post about sinking the freighter 5 to flame the spell checkers 3 to correct spelling/grammar flames 6 to argue over whether it's "freighter" or "frachter" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid 2 old salty navy retirees to inform the group that the proper term is "Liberty Ship" 15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the Merchant Marines, and that "liberty ship" is NOT correct... it was a "victory cargo" 19 to post that this forum is not about "Ship classes" and to please take this discussion to the general discussion forum 11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all encounter freighters in SH3 and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum 36 to debate which method of attacking freighters is superior, where to aim for the best results, what pistol type works best for the given type of freighter and what method of approach is best 7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different freighters 4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's 13 to quote the longest post in its entirety including all headers and signatures, and add something like the phrase "Me too" 5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the controversy 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?" 13 to say "read the GWX manual before posting questions about sinking freighters in GWX" and finally 1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 18 months from now and start it all over again. :rotfl: __________________

07-12-08, 02:07 PM	#3
UnderseaLcpl Silent Hunter Join Date: May 2008 Location: Storming the beaches! Posts: 4,254 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	LOL! This is totally untrue. I can easily cover 5 or 6 of those roles. __________________ I stole this sig from Task Force

07-12-08, 02:14 PM	#5
Jimbuna Chief of the Boat Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: 250 metres below the surface Posts: 190,500 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 13	Nice one __________________ Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something. Oh my God, not again!!

07-12-08, 03:16 PM	#7
STEED Lucky Jack Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Down Town UK Posts: 27,695 Downloads: 89 Uploads: 48	That Is So.............................................. __________________ Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT!

07-12-08, 03:17 PM	#8
STEED Lucky Jack Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Down Town UK Posts: 27,695 Downloads: 89 Uploads: 48	:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: __________________ Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT!

07-12-08, 02:12 PM	#4
KeptinCranky Ace of the Deep Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Netherlands Posts: 1,050 Downloads: 3 Uploads: 0	Sure, but can you do so in a single post?.... :hmm: :rotfl:

07-12-08, 03:19 PM	#9
Mush Martin Eternal Patrol Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 4,398 Downloads: 4 Uploads: 0	:rotfl: __________________ RIP Mush Tutorial

07-13-08, 08:47 AM	#12
Frank0001 Chief Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 317 Downloads: 16 Uploads: 0	You forgot to add a dot after your sentence. Okay, that were the three spellcheckers, we can now continue to discuss wether it's 'freighter' or 'frachter'. :rotfl: __________________ Snipers of the Seas One eel - one Kill

07-12-08, 05:50 PM	#15
Jimbuna Chief of the Boat Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: 250 metres below the surface Posts: 190,500 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 13	I think you meant "me three" __________________ Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something. Oh my God, not again!!