![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Watch
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 18
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I have seen screen shots with binos with a direction dial at the top. How do you get this feature? I have GWX 2.1 and no other mods installed except some of the Commander features.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Engineer
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 205
Downloads: 7
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I believe GWX 2.1 removed the compass display from the binocs. Earlier versions of GWX had it, but the decision was made to take it out.
__________________
Spectre |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
Yep. The bearing indicator comes with all versions of the game except GWX 2.1. They removed it partly because it's not realistic, and partly because so many of us requested it. One of them might know how you can put it back in.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Helmsman
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moncton, Canada
Posts: 105
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Here's why: When your WO reports a spotted Ship/Airplane at a certain bearing it's best to use your Binocs to scope out the target. Realistically I assume the Captain would only use the UZO for surface attacks and not for general reconnaissance as it would be limited in its turn radius -as you obviously could not spin it around 180 degrees unless you were outside the Deck on the railings - thus the bearings were also put onto the binoculars. The reason I assumed the bearings were on the Binocs was to spot targets and look an a reported target when given reports. The bearings on a binocs is still more realistic than the UZO spinning around 360 degrees considering where it is placed on the deck.
__________________
E2180 @2.6Ghz EVGA 8800GTS KO 640mb 2GB Ram - 22" Acer 1680 X 1050 GWX 2.1 w/ SH3 Cmd + OLC2 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Torpedoman
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 118
Downloads: 21
Uploads: 0
|
Teh_Diplomat
I agree with you but for a slightly different reason. Somewhere on this board Sailor Steve and I discussed it with some other folks. The short version of what I said was that a trained watch stander can call out a relative bearing angle of a sighting within 10 degrees or so. This is because that, unlike in the game, the watch stander gets to know what the bearing angle is of different parts of the ship when seen from his watch station. He gets to take his eyes off the contact, look at his ship on the same bearing, and make a mental calculation of the bearing angle before reporting in on the sound powered phones. Realism is in the eye of the beholder... Bob |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Briar Patch Runner
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 95
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Done chucked my binocs overboard since they are now useless. It is difficult if not impossible to discern which direction you're looking. I cannot even depress them enough to see the bow or the stern much less the wake to even know if I;m looking forward or backward much less port of starboard. So much for realism, but frankly its a small price to pay for the overall package.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In an octopus's garden
Posts: 565
Downloads: 99
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Sorry to interrupt you guys, but now that you're talking about the watch officer (amongst other things) let me please ask you something:
How the h*ll does the WO determine the range to the target as accurately as he does, and is his way of doing it realistic? Last edited by _Seth_; 05-23-08 at 09:25 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|