Trickery? Or real?

SUBMAN1 · 11-13-07, 01:46 PM

Higher energy output than input from such a simple device. The problem is, if it's proprietary, how could one really verify without dissecting it? What is the secret Catalyst? If you simply patent the process, it wouldn't need to remain secret, but it seems these guys have something to hide.

-S

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1965

Letum · 11-13-07, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Daily Mail

That part is the clue.

SUBMAN1 · 11-13-07, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Letum

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Daily Mail

That part is the clue.

That is the part that makes it possible that it could go either way. So I am still clueless.

-S

Letum · 11-13-07, 04:07 PM

Every year or so there is a "news" story about a "free energy machine" or a car that
runs on water etc.
It's a story that has been around for hundreds of years. It does not take a genious to
work out the validity of such claims.

11-13-07, 01:46 PM	#1
SUBMAN1 Rear Admiral Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 11,866 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	Trickery? Or real? Higher energy output than input from such a simple device. The problem is, if it's proprietary, how could one really verify without dissecting it? What is the secret Catalyst? If you simply patent the process, it wouldn't need to remain secret, but it seems these guys have something to hide. -S http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1965 __________________

11-13-07, 04:07 PM	#4
Letum Navy Seal Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: York - UK Posts: 6,079 Downloads: 43 Uploads: 0	Every year or so there is a "news" story about a "free energy machine" or a car that runs on water etc. It's a story that has been around for hundreds of years. It does not take a genious to work out the validity of such claims. __________________