Sandy Berger

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Sandy Berger, who stole highly classified terrorism documents from the National Archives, destroyed them and lied to investigators, is now an adviser to presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton.

This woman has no shame or respect for anything except her own hubris.
The man is a criminal and an advisor to a candidate for POTUS. My God what have we come to?

http://www.examiner.com/a-977346~He_...y_Clinton.html

[The Avon Lady]

This should actually have been news several weeks ago.

Ask yourself why it wasn't. :hmm: Here's a hint to the answer.

[Sea Demon]

These people are Democrats. Are you really that surprised by this? Whenever I see criminals or traitors working in cahoots with Democrats to achieve mutual interests, I'm never surprised by it. Only sickened. As far as I'm concerned, it's just more of the same from the Democrats.

[The Avon Lady]

Originally Posted by Sea Demon

These people are Democrats.

There were times back when where many US politicians of every persuasion were people of integrity, regardless of party. One doesn't have to look too far back.

Republicans are not saints, either. At the most, they are possibly the lesser of 2 evils.

The Democratic Party has been commandeered to the extreme left fringes. Here in Israel, this has also happened not only to the socilaist democratic Labor Party but even to a smaller extent to the right center Likud Party, who now espouse a platform closer to the Labor Party's own platform back in the early 90's.

The parallels are very similar.

I can find here the influencial people mostly responsible for this trend. Can you do the same in the US? It's really very easy. Follow the money.

[Sea Demon]

Originally Posted by The Avon Lady

Republicans are not saints, either. At the most, they are possibly the lesser of 2 evils.

Oh, yes. I'm aware of this. I just point out, that the Democratic party of today often works with very undesirable people. And quite often for nefarious purposes. The fact that Mrs. Clinton associates herself with a known criminal as an advisor to her campaign shows she has no shame. Just like the rest of her party. The Republicans aren't great, but they are definitely the lesser of two evils.

[nikimcbee]

A side question. Can anybody explain to me why democrats/socalists do what's best for the party first and the people second?

[The Avon Lady]

Originally Posted by nikimcbee

A side question. Can anybody explain to me why democrats/socalists do what's best for the party first and the people second?

1. The belief that other's lives have to be managed.

2. Greed.

[P_Funk]

Wanna talk about a right wing circle jerk!

Never miss a change to take the piss out of socialism do we. :rotfl:

[The Avon Lady]

Originally Posted by P_Funk

Never miss a change to take the piss out of socialism do we. :rotfl:

Actually, history and human nature have done that quite well on their own.

But keep trying!

The sun'll come up tomorrow!

[bradclark1]

Originally Posted by Sea Demon

These people are Democrats. Are you really that surprised by this? Whenever I see criminals or traitors working in cahoots with Democrats to achieve mutual interests, I'm never surprised by it. Only sickened. As far as I'm concerned, it's just more of the same from the Democrats.

:rotfl: I think you should see a psychiatrist. It's really not healthy when you are blind to your own.

[Skybird]

Some of the worst scandals in american modern history - were staged by Republicans, noit Democrats, namely Watergate, and Irangate. compared to such issues, the sexual orientation of this or that guy, or some cheap property gains by use of insider kinowledge of a given person, are peanuts that often get blown up to sizes of a sky-hiding ballon. Europeans are constantly amused by the fact that many americans seem to think that democracts are the one holding the monopole to be involved in scandals, while the republican party describes itself as sin-free and innocent. How absurd.

Just to add some balance and an opposing counter-view to this thread's strong stand against democrats:

http://www.democraticunderground.com...3/29_lies.html

"If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing it." - Edward Bernays, a nephew of Sigmund Freud, America's No. 1 Publicist in the 1920's

When is a scandal not a scandal? When a scandal appears to be connected with a member of the Republican Party, it is not reported as a "scandal." Only when a member of the Democratic Party has involvement in anything that broaches the questionable grey area is something "determined" to be a "scandal." After an eight year-long investigation of William Jefferson and Hillary Clinton was concluded with "no evidence," it is still reported as a "scandal." That $70 million in taxpayer dollars and untold hours were devoted to finding something, anything, to throw at the Clintons has shown that there was nothing to throw. The media (and I mean the major corporate media) still consider it to be a "scandal." One that just won't go away. One that has to be lied about and drummed constantly into the psyche of the American public until something resonates. What is resonating are the words that have been repeated endlessly until almost everyone can recite them verbatim.

[Sea Demon]

Originally Posted by bradclark1

:rotfl: I think you should see a psychiatrist. It's really not healthy when you are blind to your own.

Actually, I just feel strongly about not wanting to see my taxes raised, I don't want us to lose the war---which is pretty much a guarantee if the Democrats take the executive office, and I don't want to see new entitlements such as Hilary's "$5,000 for every new baby born" Mexican illegal alien giveaway program. Not to mention I'm not too happy that the Chinese despots and Islamic terrorists seemingly want to se Democrats in power. Just why would that be???

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=57970

Actually, I'm not too happy with Republicans for not pursuing the things the voters wanted from them. The Democrats are just too loathesome for my tastes. For many, many reasons.

[Sea Demon]

Originally Posted by Skybird

Just to add some balance and an opposing counter-view to this thread's strong stand against democrats:

http://www.democraticunderground.com...3/29_lies.html

Uhh, Skybird? That website is a partisan hack website, belonging to some of the most vile dredge of humanity in the USA. They are socialist kooks over there. Anything from that site can be largely discounted as pure trash.

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by Sea Demon

Uhh, Skybird? That website is a partisan hack website, belonging to some of the most vile dredge of humanity in the USA. They are socialist kooks over there. Anything from that site can be largely discounted as pure trash.

Eeeek!

It amuses me time and again to see how fanatic a reacton you can easily trigger by simply referring to somebody who dares to hold up a mirror in which republicans could see themselves.

Use google and enter "republican scandals". As minimum you get a hint that republicans are not less hesitent to get involved in scandals as democrats they love to poi8nt fingers at with determined stubborness.

I also say that I have the very strong impression the the real big bad stories delivering real substantial damage to America - see the republicans as the creators of such scandals. name a single democratic conspiracy against the Republicans that rival the meaning and importance of Nixon' Watergate. Show me one story since WWII that matches the callibre of Reagan's Irongate. show me single event since WWII where the republicans ever have become so very much the dedicated victim of a democratic intrigue, or where the american public so deliberately had been deceived, and the official foreign policy betrayed, or where administrative powers have been so decisevely beeing abused and laws cut back and/or evaded like under Bush. And I do not even start about the lies and manipulations and intimidations, threatenings and bullyings during the time of preparing the road to war with Iraq.

I currently read a wonderfully controversial book by Mearsheimer and Walt, "The Israel Lobby" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Isr...Foreign_Policy ) . the most remarkable thing about it is that the whole system they describe - immediately sprung to life and tried with almost hysteric intensity to bully the authors, to discredit them at all cost, no matter what, and gave living proof for their own existence by rejecting so blind hatefully that they do exist. Ridiculous. Marc Mazower, professor for history at the Columbia university is quoted to have said about the book: "What is striking is less the substance of their argument than the outraged reaction: to all intents and purposes, discussing the US-Israel special relationship still remains taboo in the US media mainstream. [...] Whatever one thinks of the merits of the piece itself, it would seem all but impossible to have a sensible public discussion in the US today about the country’s relationship with Israel." - the underlined last sentence could be said about the constant bashing of "democrat's scandals" and the total rejection that there are least as many scandals on republican's side (and much more dangerous and threatening ones) as well. Those sitting in the glass house, here obviously thow the biggest stones, and early, and often. That is the only reason why Clinton enjoying a blowjob could ever have become such an issue, whereas in principle that is a private issue between him, Lewinski, and Clinton's wife. Compared to that private issue, politicians and cardinals guilty of abusing children and being pedophiles is the far more significant and serious issue. but it never could rival the incredible scandal of clinton and Lewinski. Ha!

[DeepIron]

"People get the government they deserve."

It doesn't matter a wet slap what party did what, or to whom it was done, as it is all in the past. There have been political scandals since the days of the ancent Greeks and Romans... just check any good history books...

The problem is not the past, it's the present. In thread after thread, fourm after forum, people talk (complain, whine, snivel, opine, whatever) about what is now effectively, "history"...

The question is, what are we going to do about the present situation?

The short answer: nothing. The current US electoral sysem is flawed. The Electoral College system is outdated and should be overhauled. It sucks to see the popular vote go one way, and the results of the Electoral College go another...

There should be a much lower cap on what a candidate can raise, IMO. It becomes more of a focus on $$$ than issues.

The days of "responsible, citizen-oriented government" in America are gone. They died with Truman. Now Big Business, Special Interest Groups, $$$ and greed rule government in the US.


OMG! Post 179's avatar is, er, well, um.... disturbing! LOL! :rotfl::rotfl: