![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
I have returned back to SH3 and made the commitment to use only manual targeting. So far I am loving it (now if I can only do that in SH4..)
My questions concern using the Stadimeter. The theory is easy. Align the horizontal reticule mark on the waterline; Activate the stadimeter; place the new horizontal reticule mark on the highest mast; Click and Bob’s your uncle. The devil is in the details of course and I want to learn how to do this with the highest accuracy. Hence my two questions. 1. Waterline. This is pretty straight forward with most ships in that it is the boundary between the wet stuff and the hard stuff. However, if the cargo ship or tanker is running empty, it sits higher in the water. Sometimes I can see the delimitation line between what is normally above the water and what is below the water (colour change in the side of the ship). This colour change delimitation is the actual waterline of the ship. So if the ship is light, I should use this delimitation line for my height measurements and not the actual water level. Is this correct? 2. Highest mast. In the ship’s recognition manual, the highest mast is depicted pretty clearly. The problem is that when observing my ship, sometimes there is a flag mast on top of the highest mast. This flag is not depicted in the recognition manual. Since the recognition manual depicts the mast and its height, when using the stadimeter where do I put the reticule? a. At the point of the mast that is depicted in the ship’s recognition manual? This is what I have been doing. b. At the highest point which may include the extra flag mast? Since the extra flag mast was not depicted in the ship’s recognition manual, I assume that the maximum height of the mast does not reflect this extra flag height. So to sum up my ramblings: If the ship is light, I use the hull colouration to determine the “waterline” and not the actual position of the water I ignore any extensions to masts that are not depicted in the recognition manual when using the stadimeter. Am I doin this right? :hmm: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 5,499
Downloads: 45
Uploads: 1
|
![]()
The answer is A.
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
That's what I thought. Now how about my anal-retentive question about the waterline?
Or does is that question really moot as it does not affect the range calculations to a practical significance? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 5,499
Downloads: 45
Uploads: 1
|
![]()
You are correct again! You want to be lining up with the waterline.
![]() Just FYI (don't know if you'll want this) but you can pause the game and still use the stadimeter. This might be useful in severe weather or if you wanted to conduct tests. ![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
Good to know that I am doin "somethings" right in this game
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
On the other hand, for realism's sake I have to ask: did the Germans really have one?
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 571
Downloads: 77
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
from the couple of years I've been snooping around these forums the anwser seems to be no......i guess the Skipper would just count the vertiacl ticks...translate that to an angle....Id the ship for mast hieght...solve the trig for distance.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 2,537
Downloads: 129
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
But the Americans had one I believe. I also recall hearing that they made part of the German TDC wrong and instead made the part in question like the American model instead. I guess we can add the Stadimeter to that.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Subsim Aviator
|
![]() Quote:
http://personales.ciudad.com.ar/piet...Stadimeter.jpg |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ensenada, B.C., Mexico
Posts: 504
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
... It appears that the german stadimeter in that article actually works like the stadimeter in SH4, no?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Subsim Aviator
|
![]()
a stadimeter from all acounts i have seen is basically similar in operation to a sextant.
I wish i could recall where i saw this but i was almost certain that during or slightly before world war one when the Germans were leading the world in submarine technology, the Germans actually INVENTED the range finding periscope stadimeter... therfore i find it hard to believe they would not have them on their U-boat fleet during ww2. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,062
Downloads: 34
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I was left with the same questions as Platapus. Thanks for the answer!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 571
Downloads: 77
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Cool....I stand corrected!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 639
Downloads: 283
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 2,537
Downloads: 129
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
So can anyone tell me exactly what the degrees between reticle marks are in the UZO and Pero in GWX 1.03? I wanna try it out sans stad.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|