SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-12-06, 05:37 PM   #1
oscar19681
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: netherlands
Posts: 2,020
Downloads: 119
Uploads: 0
Default So how deep did the u.s subs go max?

I know that the earlier class of us subs was about 90 meters of test depth . Later it was 120 meters . But could they go deeper then the test depth? Of was this just the depth at which they imploded . German u-boats had a test depth of 150 meters but could go much deeper . Was this the same with u.s subs?
__________________
we live we die but death does not ends it.

Jim Morrison 1943-1971
oscar19681 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-06, 06:40 PM   #2
Hylander_1314
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 5 Miles Inland West Of Lake Huron
Posts: 1,936
Downloads: 139
Uploads: 0
Default

Yes later subs could go 300 to 400ft, but there were cases where they went passed 600ft. Not too often as it was very dangerous to do.
__________________
A legislative act contrary to the Constitution is not law.
-John Marshall Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

---------------------

Hylander_1314 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-06, 09:12 PM   #3
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

U.S.S Tang went to 600 feet during her first depth test. She went deeper when she went on patrol.
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-06, 11:52 AM   #4
Schatten
Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 212
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Well technically they can go down all the way...but you probably wouldn't want to be on it.

I know that's not what you meant but I just couldn't resist. The actual depth varied from class to class and boat to boat, but the accepted max safe depths for the US subs were:

S-Class, Baracuda Class : ~200 feet
P-Class, Salmon, Sargo, Tambor, Gar Classes: ~250 feet
Gato Class: ~300 feet
Argonaut, Narwhal Classes: ~330 feet
Balao, Tench Classes: ~400 feet


I know the Gato, Tench and Balao classes were actually test dove to the figures given for them. The others I'm not sure if they were actually tested or if the figures were based on builders' specs. Also those were the "safe" depths, the subs could and did go deeper. The only people who found out the actual crush depth of a boat would never be able to tell.
Schatten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-06, 02:43 PM   #5
CCIP
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Canada
Posts: 8,700
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 2


Default

Yep, just remember that U-boats technically had a safe rated depth of 90m (300ft), whereas in actuality they'd go down to 200m (700ft) and deeper, with the deepest recorded dives being in the area of 270m (900ft). It'd only be fair to assume the relationship between tested and actual maximum dive depths would be about same for US subs. Just that they didn't push it as often as the U-boats.
__________________

There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers.
-Don Van Vliet
(aka Captain Beefheart)
CCIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-06, 03:15 PM   #6
WilhelmSchulz.
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virgina Beach
Posts: 1,301
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
Default

The Gato's had a Test depth of 315 feet but they could comonly go to 400+/- feet. The Balo and Trench classes could go down to 600 feet. They could of gon deeper but that was as far as the depth guage went.
__________________
"Some ships are designed to sink… others require our assistance."

WilhelmSchulz. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-06, 06:05 PM   #7
geetrue
Cold War Boomer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Walla Walla
Posts: 2,837
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Well, it wasn't WWII that's for sure, but about twenty years after the war (1964)we took the USS Salmon SS-573 down to 650' in a hurry. Her test depth had been limited by Nav Ops to 450' due to the huge radar set up on her rear deck.

The Salmon had been built in 1956 as a radar picket boat SSR, but after the nuc's came out in 58 or so they didn't need her anymore. They took the radar off in 1961. She was the largest diesel submarine in the world (after they scrapped the ugly Jap seaplane boats that is).

She was 350' long/displacement 2,334 tons surface/3,168 tons submerged

We were out on special ops training Marine Commando's (pre seal) off of San Clemente Island ... We were suppose to surface in an old fashioned battle surface, but it had never been done in a boat this big.

I was on the stern planes and the OOD said, "Were going to do a battle surface"

I said, "Sir what is a battle surface?" He explained that I would go to full dive on the stern planes and that the bow planesman would go to full rise. Then they would blow the tanks at the same time.

He said that we should pop up like a cork and let our (now they are friends, but in those days it was more like well you know) Marine Commando's depart the sub as soon as they could on the rubber rafts they had brought with them.

We had about thirty of them up forward in the toroedo room waiting for their chance to do their thing.

Now understand you don't tell officers what to do, but in my mind I'm thinking if you put these planes on full dive she's going to go on full dive.

Following orders: "Battle surface" "Battle surface" and sure enough I put the stern planes on full dive and the bow planesman put his on full rise and they blew all of the tanks (except sanitary )

You guessed it ... we were at 400' and she went straight down ... We had really nice comfortable chairs with joy sticks and all of a sudden I was standing instead of sitting .

The controlerman back in the controller room goes all back full (on the battery is very dangerous) without recieving an order to go all back full. That alone saved us, because we were out of air. He didn't get in trouble later either.

We came up stern first of course exceeding test depth by over 200' with a real bad down angle. I was second man up with the captain coming up after me ... Just us three on the bridge as the Marines came out of the forward escape trunk to do their thing.

The OOD and the Captian and me all drew in a big gulp of air and looked at each other and started laughing ... We didn't say anything due to the seperation between officer's and enlisted men is real (know what I mean).

Later the Marines asked us if this was normal and we of course said, "Oh you bet we do it all the time"




USS Salmon SS-573
__________________

Last edited by geetrue; 03-13-07 at 11:22 AM.
geetrue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-06, 06:58 PM   #8
Schatten
Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 212
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Great story there Geetrue.

Every time you have 2 or more services operating together you get some opportuniies for those "Yeah of course we do it all the time" moments. They're always a hoot.
Schatten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-06, 10:15 PM   #9
Zero Niner
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,033
Downloads: 69
Uploads: 0
Default

I read in "Red Scorpion" that the USN had a safety factor of about 2.5x when it came to max depths for their boats. So if for instance a Balao class was rated for 400ft, in reality it could have been able to go to as deep as 800 ft safely.
Zero Niner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-06, 01:47 AM   #10
MadMike
Watch Officer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 342
Downloads: 241
Uploads: 0
Default

The USS Salmon (Salmon class) went to 500 feet when depth charged by the Japanese (then battle surfaced!)-

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=97573

And here's the link to the story of the USS Chopper (Balao/Guppy I)

http://www.usschopper.com/Chopper%20...e%20Report.htm

Yours, Mike
MadMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-06, 03:41 AM   #11
TheSatyr
Captain
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 545
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Remember though that in alot of situations it isn't going to matter how deep your sub can go because you will be in water too shallow to need to worry about it,heh.
TheSatyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-06, 07:58 AM   #12
Redwine
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Martin de los Andes, Neuquen, , Argentina.
Posts: 1,962
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
Default

I think so here we will have the same matter than in SH2 and SH3, max operative depths and max safe depths are not the same than crush depths.
Redwine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-06, 12:11 PM   #13
Safe-Keeper
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 3,234
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
I took the liberty to run the feet through Google's calculator.

S-Class, Baracuda Class : ~200 feet = 60.96 meters
P-Class, Salmon, Sargo, Tambor, Gar Classes: ~250 feet = 76.2 meters
Gato Class: ~300 feet = 91.44 meters
Argonaut, Narwhal Classes: ~330 feet = 100.58400 meters
Balao, Tench Classes: ~400 feet = 121.92 meters
Safe-Keeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-06, 12:33 PM   #14
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

But those are only approved test depths. It's like saying a type VIIb can only go to 90 meters.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-06, 12:52 PM   #15
Subnuts
The Old Man
 
Subnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,658
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zero Niner
I read in "Red Scorpion" that the USN had a safety factor of about 2.5x when it came to max depths for their boats.
I wouldn't take an S-boat to 500 feet if I were you!
__________________
My Amazon.com reviews

Subnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.