![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I've been reading Milan Vego's book lately. I've found it very interesting, but so far there's been some points I'm not sure I understand. On p. 114-5, his formula for the probability of detection for a given barrier looks suspicious because it has units. Typically, I'm used to using other equations for barrier search Pd, so it immediately stood out to me.
I'm also unclear what the goal of a "vertical synchronous maneuver with submarine," is. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,945
Downloads: 220
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I wonder if the "vertical synchronous maneuver with submarine" is in any way related to 'angles and dangles' ? :hmm:
PS. Edited out speculation on real life operations.
__________________
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity Last edited by Bellman; 02-02-07 at 11:49 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
Russians do do a test similar to angles and dangles to test if all the control surfaces are working properly.
ISBN of the book?
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,945
Downloads: 220
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Yep we know the conventional explanation:
http://americanhistory.si.edu/subs/a...les/index.html Just have a suspicion that there's more in it than just extreme testing. In what other circumstances would there be a pay-off ? Such manouvres suggest torp evasion, or unknown effects on offensive and defensive sonar. But I guess suspicions will remain speculative !
__________________
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The way he explained it, it was a way to compensate for the fact that if a target transiting your barrier is expected to be going faster than your optimal search speed, then the effectiveness of that barrier starts to drop. I'm not really clear how, though.
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Free New York
Posts: 3,167
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
...by allowing you to bring your sonar sensors into contact with sounds directed from a greater number of locations in a given ocean space for the same distance/time travelled...???
That's what the simple spreading model in DW would suggest anyway...
__________________
LW ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|