![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Subsim Diehard
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas!
Posts: 971
Downloads: 78
Uploads: 3
|
![]()
Is it just coincedence that both Russian and Nato forces use the 533mm (21inch) torpedo tube diameter or is there something special about that diameter? Why not 540mm for Nato and 531 for Russian? Or 535 for Nato and 538 for Russian... but both sides using the 533mm (21in) diameter....?
Seems always strange that both navy's were using the exact same diamter tubing seeing that they had seperate and competing designers and manufactureres...:hmm: ... are the navy's trying to copy-cat each other for some reason?... weird Anyone have any theories on what's so special about 533mm in particular?
__________________
"Seek not to offend or annoy... only to speak the truth"-a wise man Last edited by LoBlo; 08-05-06 at 08:52 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
just is nothing realy although russia still has the 400mm and 650mm tubes too.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,140
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I would guess it is a mix of factors. The 21-inch torpedo thing really reached back before NATO.
The general size of "close to 21 inches" (for a while the Germans played with 50cm while French torps tended to be 55cm until 1964) was probably an unspoken consensus of being the best compromise between capability and portability (which also means number of rounds carried), especially inside the confined spaces of a sub. When combined with the influence of the Imperial measuring system, 21 inches have become the norm more than not. Then of course NATO futher standardized things. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The US used 26.5 inch tubes on the Seawolf, I think that's like 650 mm or something.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
Yes though i belive those tubes fire standard 21 inch weapons, the extra size of the tubes was to allow the torpedoes to swim out instead of using compressed air to reduce launch transient
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Subsim Diehard
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas!
Posts: 971
Downloads: 78
Uploads: 3
|
![]() Quote:
iirc, I think the Israeli submarines have 660mm or 650mm tubes as well to enable them to fire nuclear tipped cruise missiles.
__________________
"Seek not to offend or annoy... only to speak the truth"-a wise man |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Watch
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denison, TX
Posts: 23
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
or...maybe its some kind of wishful thinking for the russians that someday they will capture one of our subs and take our torpedo's and be able to use them in their subs...i dont know just a thought :p haha
__________________
Ens Devon "Azrearl" Hathaway VMC CO USS Dallas (SSN 700) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
MK48 ADCAPS wont work on russian subs i know that one well i suppose you could use them as conventional torps but i doubt you could fire them from the 65cm torp tubes.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,320
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Besides the different physical size, wouldn't the "control logic" be different ? So a wire guided american torpedo even if it could be fired from a russian sub couldn't be controlled (wireguided) by the russian sub. :hmm: |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
Thats what im trying to say lol it cant be wire guided no, but it can be fired from the 533mm tubes as a non wire guided torpedo.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,894
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hmmm...I doubt Mk 48s would work even as conventional torpedos. The Russian sub wouldn't have the required fire control system to interface with the 48 at all, so you'd probably be able to eject it from the tube...But how would the 48 know to: turn itself on, run, enable, or arm itself, etc?
PD EDIT: That's an avatar I haven't seen. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
lol i was thinking that is it one of yours?
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,894
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Nope... a new one for the Subsim collection I guess.
PD |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Watch Officer
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 338
Downloads: 46
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Some men are born great, some achieve greatness, and some will always be total gits. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|