Reduced Tonnage RUB/SH 3 Commander

Enfilade · 10-05-05, 02:51 AM

This isn't a criticism, just a question. I have no problem with Rub reducing the stock tonnage of the C2/C3 from the stock game's 6-7k to 4+k if this is the realistic tonnage variation. Presently running Rub 1.43 (no chance to install 1.44 yet as still on patrol). But noticed the C2 and the C3 have just about the same tonnage values now. And they're pretty big suckers - especially up close! Wondering what source you're using for these dramatically reduced tonnages? Gotta sink a lot of C3's to make much of a splash..no pun intended....

10-05-05, 02:51 AM	#1
Enfilade Gunner Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 91 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	Reduced Tonnage RUB/SH 3 Commander This isn't a criticism, just a question. I have no problem with Rub reducing the stock tonnage of the C2/C3 from the stock game's 6-7k to 4+k if this is the realistic tonnage variation. Presently running Rub 1.43 (no chance to install 1.44 yet as still on patrol). But noticed the C2 and the C3 have just about the same tonnage values now. And they're pretty big suckers - especially up close! Wondering what source you're using for these dramatically reduced tonnages? Gotta sink a lot of C3's to make much of a splash..no pun intended....

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode