![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Dipped Squirrel Operative
|
![]()
Good that reactors are secure, can never explode and never "release radioactivity" in the environment (read: in your place)
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-d...-idUSKBN2BZ2U3 Seriously, how do they want to contain this at all? - The contaminated earth has been "removed" over square miles, so where is it now? You cannot "decontaminate" radioactivity as any schoolboy will tell you. You can maybe (if you are lucky, and not in Chernobyl of course) decontaminate an area, by moving the radiating stuff somewhere else, where it will then still radiate and contaminate another place then for millenia to come. In Fukushima, all the contaminated steel and iron and fuel rods have been dumped into so-called "cooling ponds" open to the atmosphere, where they will continue to "cool" (read: radiate) for some hundred thousand years to come. The water of those ponds will now be released into the sea, saying it would be "filtered" beforehand. ![]() 1. Can any physicist please explain how you want to "filter" radioactive water? 2. Then fresh water will have to be added to the "cooling" ponds. Which will be contaminated and have to be released again in a few years. And so on and so on. Who do they think they are fooling?
__________________
>^..^<*)))>{ All generalizations are wrong. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
What the article fails to mention is that they plan to release the water slowly over the next 30 or so years, and that's after it's already been diluted.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Dipped Squirrel Operative
|
![]()
It will be "diluted" alright, so what does that mean other than spreading it over a larger region, or time. 30 years do not completely "decontaminate" it either with some of the substances' radioactive half life. So they filter it, what happens with the filters?
And what do they intend to do with the steel, iron, and so on. Only thing is dumping it somewhere and hope for the best. Diluting and pumping it into the sea over the next 30 years is also not a solution, but probably the only thing that can be done anyway after the "event". I might add i do not see any change in the coastal defenses towards another tsunami, and the other plant is still working. "Another large earthquake, magnitude 7.3, struck Feb. 13, again off the coast of the Fukushima reactor complex, and the reported 30 seconds of terror was followed by14 aftershocks up to magnitude 5. The quake was severe enough that its Tokyo Electric Power Co. (Tepco) operators and federal regulators suspect it caused additional damage to reactors 1 and 3 where cooling water levels fell sharply, the Associated Press reported. The Feb. 13 quake was felt in Tokyo 150 miles away. Japan’s meteorological agency said it was believed to be an aftershock of the record 2011 quake. At a Feb. 15 meeting, government regulators said the quake had probably worsened existing earthquake damage in reactors 1 and 3 or broken open new cracks causing the cooling water level drop, the AP said." https://www.nationalgeographic.com/e...dioactive-soil https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...er-radioactive
__________________
>^..^<*)))>{ All generalizations are wrong. Last edited by Catfish; 04-13-21 at 03:24 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Soaring
|
![]()
"All things are poison, and nothing is without poison; but the dose makes it clear that a thing is not a poison." - Paracelsus.
The world cannot go without nuclear powerplants, but it should be switched to the latest technology levels indeed. Its not as if technology has stopped advancing. Only in Germany it has. which is a pity, becasue German reatcors once were considered to be the sefest in the world. Until that Tsunami in Asia set Germany under water so high as to reaching up to the medulla oblongata and cutting the central nervous system off the brain.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
Very devious imho....the food chain in the sea will grow x10 in terms of individual specimen size and the traders in the fish markets will make a fortune.
On the other hand, did they consider the effect on Godzilla? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Soaring
|
![]()
And from the - far left-leaning - Süddeutsche Zeitung:
https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/...hima-1.5263211 Quote:
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Dipped Squirrel Operative
|
![]()
The Sueddeutsche Zeitung is rather "liberal" than "left", it just does not equal your point of view, and from this point everything must be politically 'left'
![]() It is not only Tritium though, and what exactly is being done with the filters after the water has been "cleaned"? As your link provided: 30 percent of the water is being "cleaned, that leaves 70 percent i guess. And the whole water cooling system has cracks everywhere, so water flows through the ruins, all the time since 2011, and is being exchanged with sea water. As they just found out the central off limits section is still too "hot" to come near it, except for robots.
__________________
>^..^<*)))>{ All generalizations are wrong. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Dipped Squirrel Operative
|
![]()
"[...] that caused huge amounts of radioactively contaminated water to be released, which the operators of the nuclear power plant subsequently had to clean up.
One of the methods they used was reverse osmosis but it wasn't particularly effective. Although it is possible to purify up to 70 percent of the contaminated water this way, radioactive elements accumulate in the remaining 30 percent. Some of these elements are highly radioactive and remain so for thousands of years. As things stand, the Japanese government is planning to dump this water—over one million liters in total—in the Pacific Ocean come 2022." Maybe if they employ a new filter system like mentioned in the link/article below, but still what do you do with the filters. https://phys.org/news/2020-09-filter...-elements.html
__________________
>^..^<*)))>{ All generalizations are wrong. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
If they do a long time duration dispersal over large areas of the ocean, the risks can be limited.
Tritium is not very radioactive and its decay is mostly beta particles. It also has a half-life of about 12 years and decays into H3. There is no perfect solution to disposing of any radioactive material. But there are ways to mitigate the risks. If, for example, they take 10,000 gallons of the already diluted and filtered waste water and evenly disperse that over, say, 100 sq miles of ocean away from the continental shelves, away from the major currents, and the risks to marine life should be minimal. Do that 100 times in different open ocean zones over 20-30 years and you have taken care of a million gallons. A controlled dispersal schema over deep oceans over a decade or three may be the best solution. Not a perfect solution, but I can't think of any other solutions that will work better. In cases like this, they may just have to choose the least worst solution.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Great breakdown Catfish. Considering the half life of the radioactively contaminated materials, I seriously doubt anything can be filtered out. These are of course the dangers in harnessing and releasing nature, in this case Uranium and Plutonium among other elements. Another reason why extreme care is needed and then, not even that is enough. Quote:
Godzilla isn't anything to mess with. ![]() Consider this my entry in today's music thread, Jim. ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Figueira da Foz, Portugal
Posts: 4,515
Downloads: 110
Uploads: 0
|
![]() My thoughts after hearing the news was more, why all the trouble, just call Godzilla and he will take care of the radiation. Possibly would drink the all thing! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Soaring
|
![]() Quote:
Personally I currently prefer Swiss NZZ, American NBC, sometimes British BBC, and to less extend German FOCUS, it sometime sis good, bot often too populistic. I like Helmut Schmidts comment according to which he would rather read the NZZ straight away instead of the intel reports by the BND. ![]()
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
In the Brig
![]() |
![]() Quote:
My lensatic compass uses Tritium to illuminate the dial and needle at night. It requires replenishment every twelve years. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Fleet Admiral
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | ||
Fleet Admiral
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Man am I late to the Gojira dance. ![]() Good thing I'm East Coast now. I can't imagine crabbing now. ![]()
__________________
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|