![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Seasoned Skipper
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 742
Downloads: 136
Uploads: 6
|
![]()
Tiers for current RA version.
Of course its my subjective opinion for SSN's: Tier X ------ Seawolf -/- Akula III Tier IX ----- Trenchant/Seawolf 23 Tier VIII --- Virginia/Trafalgar/Suffren -/- Akula II Tier VII ---- LA III Tier VI ----- Shang -/- Akula I improved/Mike Tier V -------LA II -/- Alfa Tier IV ----- LA I -/- Akula I Tier III ----- Sturgeon L/Amethyste -/- Victor III Tier II ------ Sturgeon -/- Victor II Tier I ------- Rubis -/- Victor I Im not sure about Shang (Type 093) Are you agree with me? Have you own Tier proposition? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Chief
![]() Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 325
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I kinda disagree on VA class. It's the newest class of subs in the US navy. Its sensors and computer systems should prolly be the best in the world. At least it should match or even surpass the latest Seawolf class. I am not talking about the speed, maneuverability or deep diving ability. But in terms of sensors and computers, it should not be less.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Good Hunting!
|
![]()
Well, remember this is for as modeled in RA, not an absolute rating of real life. I'd personally put Virginia above Seawolf 23 and below Seawolf, as the game models the Virginia as slightly noisier, it is slower than Seawolf (should be faster than LA *cough* physics *cough*), and has fewer torpedo tubes.
__________________
Your friendly neighborhood modern submarine YouTuber. My videos: **Exclusive Look at Modern Naval Warfare!** Dangerous Waters Liu Doctrine (LwAmi Learn to play Dangerous Waters |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Chief
![]() Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 325
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I would definitely agree with you on VA's speed and physics. I think they just quote the info off Wikipedia and take it as official. A nuke attack sub with a top speed below 30? That's just lack of common sense.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Good Hunting!
|
![]()
It's worth noting that Permit and Sturgeon both had top speeds below 30 knots. Speed didn't come back until the LA. The Virginia basically has the same external dimensions as an LA, so you'd expect quite similar drag, and the Virginia has 40000 shp compared to the LA's 35000 shp, which alone would result in a top speed of about 34.5 knots with a back-of-the-napkin calculation (assuming the LA has a top speed of 33 knots and the Virginia has the same screw and drag properties of the LA). However, I'm not sure what type of drag/efficiency penalties apply with a pump jet. I think it's reasonable to assume the Virginia is the same top speed as the LA or maybe a knot more, given how similar the boats are in other respects.
__________________
Your friendly neighborhood modern submarine YouTuber. My videos: **Exclusive Look at Modern Naval Warfare!** Dangerous Waters Liu Doctrine (LwAmi Learn to play Dangerous Waters |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Seasoned Skipper
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 742
Downloads: 136
Uploads: 6
|
![]()
Virginia top speed is probably very close to value from RA (info from player who serve onboard real Virginia class) - i assume its less than 30 kts or not more than 30 kts.
Btw tiers table were made for RA 1.45 - not for real submarines This is sensors comparison: ![]() In my opinion Seawolf is much better than Virginia because have greater maximum and tactical speed and much greater firepower (and only noticable less sensitive sensors). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|