Starbucks gets lawsuit for firing a dwarf in Texas

[Feuer Frei!]

THE Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in the US is suing Starbucks for firing a dwarf who asked for a stool to perform her job as a barista at an El Paso, Texas shop. An EEOC statement said the lawsuit was filed today in federal court in El Paso.
It alleges that Starbucks fired Elsa Sallard after three days of training because it deemed she'd pose a danger to customers and coworkers. The EEOC contends Starbucks' actions violated the Americans With Disabilities Act.
The agency also seeks lost wages and compensatory damages for Ms Sallard and a court order that Starbucks adopt policies to correct and prevent disability discrimination.
Starbucks said in a statement that their policies provide for equal employment opportunities and strictly prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability.


SOURCE

[FIREWALL]

So. It looks like Starbucks was trying to give her the short end of the stick and, got caught.

Good for her.

[magic452]

And how big would the law suit be when she fell off the stool?
Good for her.
Magic

[Anthony W.]

Why hire a short person for a job that requires standing behind a bar?

Starbucks = dumb for hiring her in the first place

The woman = dumb for applying

The average population = 3x taller than a dwarf

The average dwarf = smart enough not to apply for a job that requires standing behind a counter

The entire situation = really dumb

[Feuer Frei!]

Originally Posted by Anthony W.

Why hire a short person for a job that requires standing behind a bar?

Lots of places hire 'challenged' people, wether physically-challenged or mentally challenged.
Some hire for the wrong reasons, ie they only hire these people because it makes them look good to the public and the media, other places hire them because they either are part of a community program which hires challenged people or they have a contract with the local disability recruitment company that outsources them.
As for hiring that person for that particular role?
It may seem a little lacking on foresight or the wrong person for the wrong job but, what if that dwarf was a gun barista?
Best dam coffee in the state?
Also if that dwarf had all the credentials and there was simply no-one else suitable for that role?
Many many reasons for the why's and how's and if's.
Good on her for getting the job, bad bad Starbuck's for discriminating.

Starbucks = dumb for hiring her in the first place

Not at all, see above.
We can't take everything on face value. They may well have had all the right intentions. Certainly not in the end.

She = dumb for applying

That's a judgment call that is not warranted and backed up by facts.
Good on her for getting that job! If i was related to her, i would have motivated her to apply for that job, no physical or mental boundaries should ever hinder a person for getting a job!
Even the 'challenged' have a right to apply for jobs that able-bodied people can do (yes, yes, ofc within reason but let's keep it simple for this debate and case) and that all 'challenged' people should never feel discriminated against.

The average population = 3x taller than a dwarf

And so what? Like i said, and i recruit people in restaurants, would i hire a dwarf who could run rings around a tall person? You bet i would.
So, moot point.

The average dwarf = smart enough not to apply for a job that requires standing behind a counter

You seem to have a problem with dwarfs applying for jobs.
So what if they want to apply for barista positions?
Or anything else for that matter.
Let them, it's their choice and God-given right to!
Just like us tall people.

The entire situation = really dumb

The only thing that's dumb here is Starbuck's ineffectiveness to support and assist the staff member in full-filling their role to the best their abilities.
Nurture and assist and support your staff!
That's what i do in my restaurant.
DON'T DISCRIMINATE ON THE ACCOUNT OF SOMEONE THAT'S EITHER PHYSICALLY OR MENTALLY CHALLENGED!

[magic452]

First off I'm all for employing handicapped people and giving them a chance and making reasonable adjustments to assist them in doing their job but there are limits to what work they are suited for.

Searbucks was not too cleaver in hiring a person who needs a stool to do her job, now a small stool in easy enough to accommodate her needs but if she falls with a hot cup of coffee in her hand and scolds either herself, a fellow employee or worse yet a customer there will be a big lawsuit as McDonald's found out. If someone trips over the stool same result.

We really don't know the particulars in the case but the lawsuit stands out in my mind. She just may have a very good case but the stool is or maybe problematic. Depends on the layout of the store I guess.

What I would like to have seen would be for Srarbuck's find a more suitable position for her. Never having been in a Starbuck's I don't know what that position would be but there must be something. Handicapped people often make very good employes because they work very hard to make up for any shortcomings they may have. I've seen it many times.

Good on her for applying for the job, bad judgement on Starbuck's for hiring her for a job for which she was not suited. Not bad on Starbuck's for discriminating as they did hire her in the first place. Pood judgement perhaps but not discrimination.

Bad on anyone that discriminates against anyone just because they have been dealt a bad hand. If they can do the job give them a shot, they may surprise you.

Magic