SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-04-11, 07:53 AM   #1
the_tyrant
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,272
Downloads: 58
Uploads: 0
Default What was the point of Force Z?

ok, so as we all know, Britain sent Force Z to Singapore in an attempt to "halt" Japanese advances

thing is though, what was the point?

Even in a traditional battleship duel they wouldn't have stood a chance

Japan's combined fleet could have easily totally destroyed force Z

I'm pretty sure the British naval leaders knew Force Z didn't stand against the Japanese combined fleet.

So why did they even bother to send Force Z to Singapore?
the_tyrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-11, 07:59 AM   #2
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

The Japanese were conducting operations across the Pacific and every battle they fought around that time they were out numbed in.

Plus I think it was intended that Force Z would operate along side US, Australian and Dutch forces once everyone got their act together. With Force Z ABDA Com would have had something like 1 CV (Force Z was intended to have one), 2 BBs, 3 Heavy Cruisers, 3 Light Cruisers, 13 Destroyers. Not bad really.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-11, 08:10 AM   #3
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Force Z was mostly a deterrent, it was sent to reinforce the Eastern Fleet in case Japan decided to move against British colonial possessions (They invaded French Indochina the previous year), but it wasn't really meant to tackle the entire Combined Fleet. Along with the HMS Indomitable, which was supposed to be there as well, it would've been a fairly viable force for smaller actions.
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-11, 09:26 AM   #4
Bilge_Rat
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: standing watch...
Posts: 3,855
Downloads: 344
Uploads: 0
Default

There were some other factors at work as well which explains why Force Z was thought to be adequate:

1) In 1941, most naval officers thought battleships at sea were fairly safe from air attack;

2) its remains unspoken even today, but in 1941, most british and american officers looked down on the japanese as an inferior (i.e. non-white) race and thought the IJN was not as competent as the USN/RN. At most, it was thought the japanese would only be able to strike in one place, probably the Philippines. Needless to say, Pearl Harbour and the next 3-4 months turned out to be a huge shock.
__________________
Bilge_Rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-11, 09:52 AM   #5
CCIP
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Canada
Posts: 8,700
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 2


Default

I don't really question the force - I think as deterrent, they were justified in being stationed where they were. The problem, really, is in the planning and execution of their ill-fated sortie - that was a serious blunder and the ships should have never sailed where they did. I think the underlying factor was the vast under-estimation of what land-based air can do to battleships. Which is very ironic, seeing that it was British planes proved quite the opposite earliest on in the war, playing such a crucial role in the Bismarck hunt and raids on the Italian fleet. Why the British thought they could but others couldn't probably does lie with the blatant disregard and disrespect of the Japanese military.
__________________

There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers.
-Don Van Vliet
(aka Captain Beefheart)
CCIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-11, 10:03 AM   #6
Tribesman
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

The real question is why force Z went ahead.
All through the planning stage it was dependent on a carrier being part of the group.
As the carriers were in turn made unavailable the deployment should have been stopped as they knew it was vital to the task.
In the end it was simply an empty gesture of bravado which threw away a lot of lives for negative benefit
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-11, 06:58 PM   #7
the_tyrant
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,272
Downloads: 58
Uploads: 0
Default

thanks guys

too bad I can't quote subsim radio room forums on my essay
the_tyrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-11, 08:13 PM   #8
Torplexed
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
 
Torplexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,823
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0


Default

British plans, such as they were, rested on the hope of American involvement. Churchill even made invitations to Roosevelt to base US ships at Singapore. American plans on the eve of war, however assumed an initial defensive posture in the Pacific. Ultimately, due to the growing strains of a world wide conflict, British planning for the defense of Malaysia was based on inexperienced troops holding air bases for which there weren't enough planes in order to defend a naval base for which there weren't enough ships. Bottom line was that the British were in an impossible situation. Their position as an imperial power and good faith with their Far Eastern dominions required them to mount some sort of defense, but by 1941 it was an improvised and incoherent defense to which no one in London was paying much attention.

Churchill was the driving force in sending in Prince of Wales and Repulse, but realized that should war come Force Z could only survive by making itself scarce. However, he may have picked the wrong man for command as Vice-Admiral Tom Phillips was one of those who remained a true believer in the capital ship in the age of air power. Phillips was counting to some degree on fighter support from land bases and intended to stay out of range of Japanese bombers. Unfortunately, fighter support became unavailable almost as soon as hostilities commenced, and the Japanese Nell and Betty bombers had a much greater range than suspected by the Allies.
__________________

--Mobilis in Mobili--
Torplexed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.