![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 | |
XO
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Croatia
Posts: 420
Downloads: 52
Uploads: 0
|
[REL] Draft Fix for all ships
Referencing:
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=168389 README: Quote:
DOWNLOAD (right click & save as) Last edited by TH0R; 04-24-10 at 11:27 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Yonkers, NY U.S.A.
Posts: 1,507
Downloads: 154
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Great job Thor!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
XO
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Croatia
Posts: 420
Downloads: 52
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Thanks.
![]() A part of it is included. The following subs have received a draft adjustment: Porpoise, Gato, Balao and Tench. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
since the subs in the game are not correctly aligned on its axis and float "level" or flat and the decks are not properly sitting at an upward angle as they were in real life and their painted waterlines show, how did you choose the correct place to put them since you will always be too high at the stern or too low at the bow?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
XO
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Croatia
Posts: 420
Downloads: 52
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() The values I recommended to Luke are merely +0,1 changes to the Gato, Balao and Tench boats with the exception to the Porpoise which received -0,4 compared to the previous RFB draft value. Balao/Tench and Gato/Tambor/Gar are more or less accurately aligned longitudinal axis wise, so it was very easy to find the most accurate draft setting. With Porpoise it is a different case, just as you mention it - if we set it to the water line its stern will be too high, and stern tubes will stand out of the water. This is the only difference between GFOv1.1 and RFB/RSRDC versions of my mods - I have set porpoise to match the water line in GFO (draught value 5,1) version and with RFB I've set it to match the top of the stern tubes 5 & 6 (draught value 5,4) which when you look at the boats bow port holes matches the WW2 pictures almost perfectly. The reason why I did it this way - in stock environment /sea it is more difficult to spot accurate values, even on 0 m/s winds, compared to RFB's RE where flat seas are really flat and any deviation of the draught value becomes apparent. Values of all other subs in GFO mod are from RFB, as you can see in the excel file I wrote. The basis of my calibration were bow port holes. I have calibrated the boats so that the water surface matches their lower end or in line with the much smaller portholes located just in between the bow port holes and torpedo tubes 1 & 2. After studying many WWII pictures (mostly those pictures when boats were sailing of on their patrol, in port and on calm, flat seas) and many documentaries - I have seen that this was the most common case how they were trimmed. They were probably trimmed even deeper when in combat area to shave off few seconds of the dive times, but they definitely weren't sitting as high as in stock game - which best resembles today's museum examples where boats aren't loaded with torpedoes, provisions and crew. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|