SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-16-09, 10:40 AM   #1
msalama
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In an octopus's garden
Posts: 565
Downloads: 99
Uploads: 0
Default Deepest you've gone in a VIIC Early?

My record is 254m, attained yesterday. Now I don't know whether the auld gel could've still taken a meter or two, but I'm glad I didn't have to find out

You?

PS. GWX 3.0 is my preferred poison ATM if that makes any difference.
msalama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-09, 11:08 AM   #2
Puster Bill
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BA8758, or FN33eh for my fellow hams.
Posts: 833
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

At least 1,000 meters.
__________________
The U-Boat Commander of Love
Puster Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-09, 12:18 PM   #3
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,500
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

1,001 meters
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-09, 12:23 PM   #4
irish1958
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Carmel, Indiana
Posts: 3,250
Downloads: 320
Uploads: 11
Default

All the way to the bottom numerous times.
__________________
Irish1958
irish1958 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-09, 12:24 PM   #5
Murr44
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 913
Downloads: 16
Uploads: 0
Default

405 meters but still managed to surface.
Murr44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-09, 12:27 PM   #6
A Very Super Market
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Deep in the Wild Canadian suburbs.
Posts: 1,468
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Straight to the bottom.
__________________


The entire German garrison of Vanviken, right here in your thread!
A Very Super Market is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-09, 01:33 PM   #7
Lt.Fillipidis
Weps
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Veria, Greece
Posts: 365
Downloads: 44
Uploads: 0
Default

280m If i remember right. Tried to avoid a squadron of planes and in the "Crash Dive" proccess, i took a direct hit.Sank, but managed to bring it back on the suface with 7% integrity and a big hole on the bow section.
Lt.Fillipidis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-09, 01:44 PM   #8
Puster Bill
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BA8758, or FN33eh for my fellow hams.
Posts: 833
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

1,000 meters plus infinity.

Seriously, though, I can't remember how deep I've gone and still made it back up, but it's got to be around 250 or 260 meters.
__________________
The U-Boat Commander of Love
Puster Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-09, 03:32 PM   #9
Bosje
Seasoned Skipper
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 732
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
Default

287 and got back home, great ride
__________________
And when an 800-ton Uboat has you by the tits... you listen!
Bosje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-09, 05:11 AM   #10
Oneshot/Onekill
Captain
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Drinking a cold one in Davey Jone's locker.
Posts: 487
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0
Default

Realistically Type VIIC U-boats had a crush depth of around 200meters.IMPO the crush depth's in game are way to extreme. Personally i dont go below 160-180 meters and thats only as a last resort! The type VIIC41 was designed to go much deeper than the type VIIC. The 7C main difference than the 7B was better sea keeping charatisitics, particulary the bow was redesigned. and the were the turret upgrades that the 7B did not have. other than that the 7b AND C both had single pressure hulls designed out of the same materials. The 7C41 on the other hand was designed with a DOUBLE pressure hull and used a different type of steel. If you are all refering to the Type VIIC41 here instead of the standard type VIIC then disregard everything i've just written.
Oneshot/Onekill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-09, 06:24 AM   #11
Graf Paper
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest United States
Posts: 1,146
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 2
Default

For all that redesign to give the VIIC better sea-keeping than the VIIB, you'd think it would have improved her speed. Instead, the VIIB is faster in all regards; suface speed, submerged speed, and dive time.

I've taken a VIIB all the way to 227 meters before I started taking damage from the pressure.

In the VIIC, that depth was not much greater... 234 meters.

Despite the VIIC/41's double-hull design, I've never gotten much past 240 meters without taking damage from the pressure.

I do used the "Randomize Crush Depth" feature in SH3 Commander, so that does make a difference. I like that little bit of uncertainty too add to the drama. When the question is always there, "She took this depth in the last patrol but can she survive this extreme depth again?", it makes for some some good fun.
__________________
Still sailing the high seas, hunting convoys with those who join me.
Graf Paper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-09, 06:44 AM   #12
Oneshot/Onekill
Captain
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Drinking a cold one in Davey Jone's locker.
Posts: 487
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0
Default

@Graf Paper, I think, and i am only speculating right now as i am too lazy to go back to some of my research materials right now, LOL. The reason that the type VIIC was slightly slower than the 7B, was 2 fold, 1 the length because of the redesigned bow was extended and thus the 7C was heavier than the 7B, they both used the same Diesel engine designs, and the same batteries, which as an end result gave the 7C a slighty lower surface and submerged speed AND reduced battery endurance underwater. One interesting thing to note the type VIIC41 had the same surface speed as the type VIIB, and without me doing a quick reference i am curious to know if that was because of the new type of Reenforced steel used, or an improved engine or supercharger? I would be interested to hear any theories.
Oneshot/Onekill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-09, 09:58 AM   #13
msalama
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In an octopus's garden
Posts: 565
Downloads: 99
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Realistically Type VIIC U-boats had a crush depth of around 200meters.
Uboat.net says their maximum depth was 220m. See here:

http://uboat.net/types/viic.htm

So my personal record of 254m might or mightn't be a tad über... but then, aren't there RL stories, too, of some VIICs diving to approx. 280m and surviving? Even if you don't believe Herbert Werner, who seems to have let his imagination run a bit wild when writing his memoirs...

Or maybe they (i.e. SH3Cmdr & random crush depth) really DID give me an exceptionally sturdy boat this time, huh???

PS. Sorry for the rambly tone, a slow day at the office here
msalama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-09, 05:05 PM   #14
Otto Heinzmeir
Weps
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Wilhelmshaven Local Pub
Posts: 361
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
Default

The trouble with finding the maximum depth. Is you have to keep going deeper and have the hull fail to know what the maximum is.
Otto Heinzmeir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-09, 06:02 PM   #15
Oneshot/Onekill
Captain
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Drinking a cold one in Davey Jone's locker.
Posts: 487
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0
Default

@msalama. I said AROUND 200 meters. I was speaking from memory, i didnt have the energy at the time i wrote that to verify my accuracy.
Oneshot/Onekill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.