![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Weps
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Veria, Greece
Posts: 365
Downloads: 44
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I can tell that a torpedo set to impact detonators is better than one with magnetic, although there is a chance to bounce off if there's a certain angle.
What i CANT tell and im asking your opinion in this, is this: Lets say we have a shot amidships on a battleship. Is it better to have a near surface torpedo, set to impact detonator or to have one a bit below the ship, set on magnetic detonators so we can have something like this: I know that impact detonators can cut in two a ship as large as a medium cargo but wouldnt an explosion underneath the ship cause enough damage to flood at least a couple compartments? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Weps
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Control Room
Posts: 355
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Any explosion in close proximity to, or at, the hull can cause a breach which will lead to flooding. However, for larger ships, only a magnetic exploding under the keel has the potential to break the keel, thereby ripping the ship in half.
__________________
100% realism, DiD Harbor Traffic 1.47(incl. RUB) Using SH3 Commander to implement many custom realism tweaks Covered 1939-1945; now restarting in 1939 again. Completed 39 careers, 210 war patrols, 4.7Mt sunk, 19 subs lost |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sparky
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 154
Downloads: 64
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Personally I just look at what angle I'm approaching the target at Head on, Magnetic under the hull From the side, impact into the guts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|