![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Loader
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 83
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Gents,
I've just got a lead back to me about two recent conversions done on Kilo SSK with Li-ion battery installations. Currently endurance is measured around the following Lead-acid Battery Installation 400nm @ 3knots for 5.5 days travel 200nm @ 6 knots for 1.38 days travel 100nm @ 12 knots for 8.33 hours travel 50nm @ 24 knots for 2.08 tactical speed Li-Ion Battery Installation 750nm@ 3 knots for 10.5 days travel 375nm@ 6 knots for 2.6 days travel 187nm@ 12 knots for 15.5 hours 95nm @ 24 knots for 3.9 hours tactical speed Huge differences here in battery technology!!!! This would be a perfect solution for the RAN's Collins Class as the distances that are required for the patrolling of Australia's coast line is 100 times greater than that of their European friends. As this sub was developed for the cold war to sit off a coast line to defend against a Russian invasion fleet it's lead-acid batteries don't cope with the long distance and high tranisit speeds required for the RAN requirements. Is there anyway of altering the Kilo to be able to incorporate such figures? Captcav |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
![]() Quote:
![]() We need to infiltrate Sonalysts and stole their DW hard code better yet Kim Castro's wife or children. And we would then start demanding that they fix the Kilo battery ASAP. I'm stil trying to procure C4 and AK-47. But I don't think I can afford the air travel :rotfl:. Perhaps I could try swimming. They say the world is a small place.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|