|
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
|
09-01-08, 04:30 AM
|
#1 |
|
Soaring
 Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,626
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
CHESS 2008: Clive Bradbury vs. Skybird
Your go, Clive!
[shake hands] Your move: 1. ?
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
|
|
|
09-01-08, 05:04 AM
|
#2 |
|
Captain
 Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: stoke-on-trent, UK
Posts: 492
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 0
|
1. e4
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-08, 05:08 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Silent Hunter
 Join Date: May 2008
Location: Storming the beaches!
Posts: 4,254
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
__________________
 I stole this sig from Task Force 
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-08, 05:31 AM
|
#4 | ||
|
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: stoke-on-trent, UK
Posts: 492
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
09-01-08, 05:46 AM
|
#5 |
|
Soaring
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,626
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
He has a point, Clive, and there is a reason why correspondence chess uses numerical four digit code to identitfy orginal and target square. I really would recommend to stick to the basic principle behind it to repeat the past move of the opponent and then give one's own in full notation. It helps to evade reading or writing mistakes and makes a player aware before he is posting his move wether or not he maybe was misreading the last move he is answering to - so that he calculated on a wrong assumption. It all is just about preventing mishaps and misunderstandings.
your move: 1. e2-e4 my move: 1.../c7-c6
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
|
|
|
|
09-01-08, 05:54 AM
|
#6 |
|
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: stoke-on-trent, UK
Posts: 492
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 0
|
No problem, will do.
1....c7-c6 2. d2-d4 |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
