SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-23-07, 08:46 PM   #1
Chock
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Under a thermal layer in chilly Olde England
Posts: 1,842
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default Quick preview of my latest movie

To celebrate the advent of the Dangerous Waters screenshot stickied thread, I decided to have a crack at doing a movie with DW, so here's a quick preview:



Chock
__________________
Chock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-07, 09:28 PM   #2
waste gate
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

I love the comedy. Your sense of humor gives me a grin. Thanx Chock.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-07, 05:05 AM   #3
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,525
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

I gotta admit, you have a talent for this sir
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-07, 07:40 AM   #4
kiwi_2005
Eternal Patrol
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Aeoteroa
Posts: 7,382
Downloads: 223
Uploads: 1
Default

Yep great movie
__________________
RIP kiwi_2005



Those who can't laugh at themselves leave the job to others.



kiwi_2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-07, 09:29 AM   #5
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Hey! That background didn't look like a Katyusha submarine! This is what a Katyusha submarine looks like!



Leave it to sub simmers to set things straight.

Now on to the background screens. THose didn't look like an Akula class background either, so maybe you got the correct Katyusha internal photos? At subsim here, we expect it to be correct and accurate at all times!

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-07, 10:16 AM   #6
Chock
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Under a thermal layer in chilly Olde England
Posts: 1,842
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Not that it matters, cos I'm only doing a bit of a p*ss take, but, I just randomly picked the name Katyusha for the submarine itself, mainly because the song of that name is one of the bits of music in the film. At one point it was going to be called the Kalinka (another cliche Russian tune that gets used), so it wasn't actually meant to be the type, rather the name of the sub.

The backgrounds were from an Echo-class submarine, this is because the interiors in the Hunt For Red October are incorrect too, being way too futuristic-looking (especially the periscope which looks like the Cylons designed it), it was meant to be a silly retro reference to that, going the other way.

In view of the fact that they repeatedly get the name of the sub sort of wrong in The Hunt For Red October too, I used an 'Akula' rather than a 'Typhoon'. Strictly speaking, the souped-up 'Typhoon' in Red October should be called an Akula, since it is meant to be an advanced version of a Project 941 sub , which is, in reality, called the Akula (shark) by the Russians, the designation 'Typhoon', being only the military NATO designation for it and not what the CIA call it. So it should only be the crew on the Dallas that call it a 'Typhoon' and probably not the CIA characters, especially Jack Ryan, who is supposed to be really au fait with Russian intricacies. What NATO call the Akula, in reality being the Project 971, and more likely to be referred to as the Gepard (or something similar) by the Russians, as I think that vessel is the class type designation boat for the 'improved Akula', as it often gets referred to. 'Confusing it is', as Yoda would say.

Incidentally, if you want attempt to clarify all that malarkey for yourself, I can recommend Wayne Frey's book, Russian Submarines: Guardians of the Motherland (ISBN 0-7414-3447-4), which is full of really cool pictures of all those types of subs and explains a lot of their workings too.

Or you could just ignore all that and watch my silly film:rotfl:

Chock
__________________
Chock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-07, 11:30 AM   #7
STEED
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Down Town UK
Posts: 27,695
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 48


FILM 2007

BOO, BOO TO SHORT.


I want my money back.


What a rip man.
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017.

To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT!
STEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-07, 11:46 AM   #8
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chock
Not that it matters, cos I'm only doing a bit of a p*ss take, but, I just randomly picked the name Katyusha for the submarine itself, mainly because the song of that name is one of the bits of music in the film. At one point it was going to be called the Kalinka (another cliche Russian tune that gets used), so it wasn't actually meant to be the type, rather the name of the sub.

The backgrounds were from an Echo-class submarine, this is because the interiors in the Hunt For Red October are incorrect too, being way too futuristic-looking (especially the periscope which looks like the Cylons designed it), it was meant to be a silly retro reference to that, going the other way.

In view of the fact that they repeatedly get the name of the sub sort of wrong in The Hunt For Red October too, I used an 'Akula' rather than a 'Typhoon'. Strictly speaking, the souped-up 'Typhoon' in Red October should be called an Akula, since it is meant to be an advanced version of a Project 941 sub , which is, in reality, called the Akula (shark) by the Russians, the designation 'Typhoon', being only the military NATO designation for it and not what the CIA call it. So it should only be the crew on the Dallas that call it a 'Typhoon' and probably not the CIA characters, especially Jack Ryan, who is supposed to be really au fait with Russian intricacies. What NATO call the Akula, in reality being the Project 971, and more likely to be referred to as the Gepard (or something similar) by the Russians, as I think that vessel is the class type designation boat for the 'improved Akula', as it often gets referred to. 'Confusing it is', as Yoda would say.

Incidentally, if you want attempt to clarify all that malarkey for yourself, I can recommend Wayne Frey's book, Russian Submarines: Guardians of the Motherland (ISBN 0-7414-3447-4), which is full of really cool pictures of all those types of subs and explains a lot of their workings too.

Or you could just ignore all that and watch my silly film:rotfl:

Chock
By the way - I'm not being serious either! :rotfl:Just poking at you!

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.