![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Engineer
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Flint, Michigan, USA
Posts: 200
Downloads: 92
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I've just started playing DW after a lengthy lay-off. I'm working on my skills using 688i and Seawolf. Once I've got them "down" I'll move on to the russian subs.
I've read as much material as I can find here to help me stop relying on Auto-crew. I'm wondering, if Auto-crew is as bad as it has been stated. I've read various posts on here saying that you will do a better job of playing the missions if you don't use the Sonar and TMA auto-crew. Yet I've found that if I have sonar auto-crew on, they "find" contacts alot sooner than I do if auto-crew is off. If the auto-crew guys are so "bad" how come they pick up contacts sooner in scenarios than I do. Granted I'm not an expert, but I can use my ears and eyes to "see" lines of a contact on the waterfall display. Why is it when I play a scenario using auto-crew Sonar almost always picks up contacts immediately. Yet when I re-start that same scenario and I turn auto-crew off, I don't "find" contacts" Are my eyes and ears that bad? I'm not talking about any particular scenario, it just seems like those things happen in general. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: AN9771
Posts: 4,904
Downloads: 304
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Sounds like you can't find the contacts because of your screen's gamma settings. The lines on the waterfall are there, but having pixel intensities that are too close to the noise pixels for your eyes to see the difference. Autocrew doesn't have that visual impairment. Gamma can enhance the low intensity pixels significantly while leaving the stronger pixels relatively the same. But this works for all other screens aswell. Even the game's main menu. Waterfall may look better, but all others will look bleak. But who cares, sonar is most important. You can adjust the number on the following line (there probably is no number yet) in the dangerouswaters.ini file with a text editor:
.Gamma "0.5" 0.5 works for me. Your mileage may vary. Or maybe you can adjust this setting on your videocard or monitor. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Engineer
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Flint, Michigan, USA
Posts: 200
Downloads: 92
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Thanks I'll give that a shot, and see if that helps my detection ability.
Changing gamma to "0.5" helped but Auto-crew guy still gets contacts that I don't hear or see.............. Last edited by nutworld; 12-23-06 at 10:41 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Eternal Patrol
![]() Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,923
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Do it yourself, much better. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Engineer
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Flint, Michigan, USA
Posts: 200
Downloads: 92
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I'm not understanding HOW I can do it much better, when the Auto-crew guy picks up contacts that I don't see or hear. Changing the gamma setting helped with the view-able pixles in the waterfall display, but there are still contacts that I don't "see/hear". What's the next step Fish? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central MO
Posts: 1,562
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Might I suggest that you scan in NB first to find contacts, then move to BB to mark your contact. There is another post somewhere here lately regarding sonar I'm sure.
EDIT:...Reference this topic... Assigning trackers:NB vrs. BB |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|