View Single Post
Old 06-21-06, 05:09 AM   #7
MENTAT
Sparky
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mediterranean
Posts: 156
Downloads: 220
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Khayman
Presumably 100m was not enough to ensure the safety of the sub if the torpedo went off prematurely. 300m was probably a safer number given that it's pretty pointless for a sub to blow itself up.
to blow itself up? if it goes up at 100m or 150m, will it waste its host sub? I dont think so! especially if you think Depth charges are barely effective in 50m?

Anyway aint a destroyer at 100m not more deadly?? I believe a pursuing destroyer could be hit easily with a stern torpedo as it never goes farther than a 150m perimeter in a bomb run..

I still wonder why 300m? and not 200m or 100m? That should have a better explanation than damaging the sub
MENTAT is offline   Reply With Quote