Quote:
Well we saw that having the servers in the US are no protection against election manipulation if you do it cleverly 
Most will even now say that it did not happen because "what should not happen cannot happen (and "has not happened" lol).
|
As I have said - the editorialisation is a much more potent influence tool than any third party (ie Cambridge Analytica) can build.
Look up algorithmic fairness that Google is working on.
Quote:
|
I do not like it either, but if the world/international citizen wants to change this, we'd need an international free independent organisation that provides that kind of independent anonymous internet.
|
Spoken like a true globalist
So what do nation-state citizens do, when actors from another nation-state attempt to influence their political choices via the services they use on the (enforced by parallel actions) monopoly?
For example, imagine if FB and Google were Russian companies, with politically and socially conservative Russian teams running the editorialising policy, how would you respond to this?