Ok, perhaps my tone is a bit condescending and I apologize for that. I was certainly getting frustrated on the last post, mainly because of sentences like:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockin Robbins
It's an interesting paper you cite. It makes many logical errors........So logical errors are ignoring the capacity and affordability of the cost.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockin Robbins
Logically your paragraph is fallacy built on fallacy. Correct facts do not make a coherent thought. They must be teamed with appropriate logic. That factor is entirely missing.
It is the disjointed logic...
|
That being said, providing evidence in support of a viewpoint is the cornerstone of debate. So unless he does actually provide some evidence to look at, I consider the matter to be settled for my end.