[CaptainMattJ.]

Originally Posted by TorpX

Does this line of reasoning apply to others as well? Bill Clinton for instance?

I completely fail to see both the relationship between the two and the point you're trying to make.

Originally Posted by Platapus

But Ex-wives/girlfriends would never lie about something like that just to get even or something towards someone they are angry with. That would be wrong.

3 different woman and an entire murder investigation, along with testimony from multiple neighbors, all claiming the same exact thing: that Zimmerman is an ill-tempered arse.

Either everyone is out to get him or he is one particularly bent-out-of-shape individual. And ive seen alot more angry jerks than ive seen victims of a targeted conspiracy.

Originally Posted by Armistead

It's obvious GZ has issues and I'm sure his life hasn't been the same, but I don't equate any of his actions with the Martin case. The one fact there is he didn't shoot until Martin was on top of him beating him up, so I believe the verdict was correct.

I do see a dark future for GZ, he is marked in many ways and life will be difficult. People know being around him can and will get them in the news and on talk shows....

How can such a contested and obfuscated detail be considered factual at all, for either side of the debate? The whole incident was obfuscated. Nobody knew enough solid information to either fully redeem nor convict zimmerman.

As to your other point, what about the people who accused him of being belligerent BEFORE the martin case