[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

Steve, I have considered other possibilities, for a long time I believed in the single shooter theory, but based on research etc, just does not make sense.

So you keep saying. I would suggest doing a little research.

Sorry, yes bullet impacts can make human body do weird things, but the Kennedy head wound entering from the back , exploding the back of his head, coming out the front with a neat hole? reversing the entrance and exit wounds? lol come on now.

As I said, you seem to be latching onto the favorite theories without doing the slightest bit of investigation yourself.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/head.htm (warning: it's a bit graphic)

The film is there, he clearly recoils back from taking a hit to the forehead/temple area, bullet exits out the back.

I've just finished watching the film several times. Yes, his head snaps back. The spray, however, clearly flies forward, consistent with the passage being from rear to front.

Bullet was damaged, mangled from what I have read.Yet the supposed second shot from Oswald, the magic bullet, hit Kennedy in the back, exited his throat, went through hit Governor Connolly, did some zigs like it had a tiny rocket motor in it, exited, his his wrist and survived intact? come on now.

The bullet was mangled after travelling at an angle through the top of the skull. As to your "zigs like it had a tiny rocket motor in it"? Once again the slightest bit of research would show you otherwise.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-bullet_theory
Scroll down to see the pictures of possible bullet paths.

Like anything, government has a weak explanation that it peddles to contradict the truth.RFK allegedly made the statement "If the truth about Dallas came out, there would be blood in the streets"

You have the temerity to say "Come on now"? [Citation please].

This professor gives a great run down

First, the video starts with James Files, who apparently is not even believed by the conspiracy theorists. That's not good.

you would enjoy the detail he goes into

He does spin a good tale, I'll give him that. His talk about the lunchroom doesn't take into account the fact that Oswald was the only employee who left the building before the police cordon was set up. The fact remains that Oswald killed officer J.D. Tippit when Tippit stopped him for questioning.

Really, if it were one person or two but it's many, some stayed quiet out of fear, others were silenced long ago

Again, nothing but conjecture on your part. How would you, or anyone, know they stayed quiet out of fear? Maybe they stayed quiet because they had nothing to say. How would you, or anyone, know others were silenced? They died. Some say the circumstances were suspicious. Were they? If they were, what does that prove?

Again, I'm not denying anything, or even taking sides. Of course the conspicacy theorists may be right. The problem is that they have yet to show a single bit of evidence that can't be explained by the accepted story.