View Single Post
Old 09-27-12, 01:50 PM   #8
soopaman2
Der Alte
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 3,316
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mapuc View Post
I'm a ordinary person that can't figure out wich one of these two article that is correct

The one that Vendor posted in this thread or this one below

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/160353

Markus
Lets suppose this was true.

Why would they want nukes, to protect them from a neighbor who has them too?

Lets say Iran launched, it would in my opinion lead to a global thermonuclear war. As allies retaliate against each other, and China and Russia jump in simply for the excuse to nuke America. It would result in the same Mutually Assured Destruction (mad) that kept the Soviets and Americans from ripping each others heads off from the 1950s to the early 90s.

Iran is more rational than most ME countries. We only "hate" them because they talk bad about the Jews, and question if they belong there, which I do.

Do I need to be nuked or sanctioned?

Monkey man Mahmoud is a cancer, but I fear what would take his place. He at least has restraint.
__________________
If Hitler invaded Hell I would make at least a favourable reference to the devil in the House of Commons.

-Winston Churchill-

The most fascinating man in the world.
soopaman2 is offline   Reply With Quote