Quote:
Originally Posted by Castout
They are campaigning basically that women are just another kind of animal. A pet that should be exploited sexually than anything else.
|
You are aware that the peta campaigns with naked women are something else than the planned porn site?
The campaign where they put naked women in cages was
against animal exploitation, putting a human into a cage should illustrate the living conditions that caged animals have. The nakedness of the girls should draw attention rather than objectify a woman - any sexual connotation was certainly not their primary target in those campaigns. The nudity should illustrate vunerability, as the women have no "protecting shell" around them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainHaplo
[...]
Want to stop the objectification of women? Stop trying to sissyfy men and instead teach them that control starts with self.
|
I agree with most of the statements you made above, didn't want to quote it all, though I am not sure what you mean with the sissyfying of men. Do you mean it in the sense that many men don't dare to flirt/make a move towards women (anymore)?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainHaplo
A man who can control himself has no need to objectify a woman.
|
Yep! This is what escpecially pees me off about cultures who want to hide their women under cloth for "their protection".
I see it as an insult towards males, like "You males are a bunch of primitive animals who you can't control yourselves, that's why we must hide anything that can arouse you." - something which makes rape look like a natural instinct.