Quote:
Originally Posted by breadcatcher101
Well if she had a "submachine gun" I bet it wasn't full auto. Those run at more than 15k. Probably it was a semi-auto version and not a submachine gun.
Kinda like all these semi-auto "assault weapons", sounds dramatic in the news even they are nothing more than a military looking deer rifle.
If it doesn't rock and roll it is not a machine gun or an assault weapon.
As for the cops stealing her firearms I hope they wind up paying her dearly for their actions.
|
Uh how do you figure that she cant own a true automatic weapon if she has the proper licensing then she could easily own one you do not have to filthy rich to get a class 3 it is a bit steep to me(cost of it and cost of full auto guns) but if one was really into guns and wanted what a class 3 allows you then that could easily be even a working class persons hobby she may have been collecting for years you dont know.
Just as there are working class people that have classic cars.Besides in the US military "assault rifles" are rarely fired fully auto in fact you are more deadly firing controlled semi auto so in that respect an AR-15 is very very close to an M-4.
If you own an FN FAL or any clone then you have in effect the exact same rifle that the Royal Army and Marines used for many years as their L1A1s where semi automatic only and that still makes it an assault weapon unless you want to argue that no member of the British,Australian,or New Zealand military never used this rifle very effectively in combat aginst enemies that had fully automatic rifles yet got defeated by a semi auto.