Quote:
Gun-control advocates claim that denying guns to everyone means that gun crimes will be stopped.
|
Thats false twice, or even three times if you look.
Quote:
Here is a society with strong gun controls
|
Are you kidding?
Then you go on to passages I didn't quote.
But anyway lets deal with some
Quote:
His stated point, and I do agree.
|
I agree, gun control does not stop gun crime, but only an idiot would claim it did so putting that up as a position to oppose is pure bull.
Effective gun control may reduce gun crime but the only way to stop gun crime is to make gun crime legal.
Quote:
A positive case made for his argument. He may or may not be right, but he clarifies his argument and attempts to make his point. Where is the strawman?
|
Its in the wording again, he builds a false claim to argue against.
In this case "eliminates"
In each instance he is taking it to absolutes to make a "good" case to stand against but each time is instead making a "false" case to knock down.
Quote:
Here we have a set of irrelevant jabs intended to minimize August's points
|
No, there you have 4 jabs which minimize augusts points and a response to Jims funny about prison "recreation" activities
If you look at the Darkfish exchange you can see it clearly, he takes a position and changes it in the same way so he can knock it, classic strawman