[Stealth Hunter]

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

You prove NOTHING.

Actually, I proved that Germany was not solely responsible for World War II, thereby refuting your claim that they were.

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

Instead bringing historycal data regarding the current subject you go around it.

How exactly? Empty words, my friend.

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

To bad you did not mentioned Jesus and Roman Empire as well.

Jesus and the Roman Empire have nothing to do with Germany, the Second World War, Poland, or European politics of the 20th century from 1920-1945.

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

In conclusion what was the plan for Germans regarding Poland?

If you had bothered to read my post, let alone any of my citations, you would have noticed that they were only planning to go after provinces that they had originally owned- particularly focusing on Danzig. Evidently, you did not bother to... conveniently enough. The plan after the invasion began was to split the country with the Soviet Union, as per the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. And this was done. It could have been avoided if the Poles had turned over the respective territories that rightfully belonged to Germany, but they didn't. They were sure as hell quick to take territory from the Germans (as they did with Silesia), but no sir, they couldn't give any that really didn't even belong to them (like Danzig).

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

Hm!! You know the answer

Yep. Gave you lots of good information in that post of mine I quoted above.

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

and i know the answer.

Pray tell then, why did you ask me what the German plans were for Poland then? If you knew, it should not have been necessary.

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

So don`t try to play this games with me ok.

Or what? What are you going to do lol? Not a damn thing.

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

What happend to Russian soldiers in Poland in that time, you know?

Russia did not have any soldiers in Poland when the Germans invaded in 1939, you moron...

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

Innocent Germans shoot them in the back and latter invade they country as well

Lol, well that's got to be difficult. Shooting someone in the back who isn't even physically there, I mean. Kudos to them for accomplishing such a miraculous feat.

Originally Posted by Dimitrius

(one of the biggest mistakes Hitler done if you ask me).

Good thing I didn't ask you then. It's also good nobody takes this hogwash you're spouting seriously. Let me repeat myself: the Soviet Union did not have soldiers in Poland when Germany invaded in 1939. There was not a single Russian trooper who could have therefore been shot in the back. Quit lying.

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

The bottom line is:
Hitler wanted to take over the world,

Well now... we have a pretty definitive answer on who here hasn't read Mein Kampf. Hitler was not interested in taking over the world. He wanted to reach the resource-rich areas of Russia to build his vision of Germania. He wanted to share Europe, as well, with the British and French, as well as Italy. That's it. That's how simple it is (and, for that matter, was).

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

just like any dictatorship wants.

Sweeping generalizations will get you nowhere. Not all dictatorships want to take over the world... to think so is grossly ignorant.

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

And just like you buddy in Iran also wants.

Or like your prime minister buddy wants with Palestine.

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

You probably going to denie this as well.

I'm just going to point out where you're right and where you're wrong. So far, you're not doing so good as far as correct statements made are concerned.

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

See a person like to type long and big words.

Or, more correctly, people like me like to act like sophisticated, well-educated individuals who actually have respect for history.

Conversely, people like you have no regards whatsoever for the past, let alone civilized discussion.

Originally Posted by Dimitrius07

But when it comes to explanation he start to spam.

Spam? Why there's no spam here. Not from this poster. But you on the otherhand... dozens of these tiny posts that say the same crap over and over again: "I'm right, these are the facts, I'm right, I'm infallible!" You use no citations or anything, you just talk and talk about how you're right. Saying you're right does not make you right. Concurrently, when other sources show that what you are saying is incorrect, it's up to you to prove them wrong. And you have not done that once in this entire thread. You disappoint.