Rip - ''The baffle is less than 120 degrees''
How much less ? - lot of room down to our DW 60 deg.
Rip -''The depth change data is fairly accurate''
Which data - Greenville trans. or mine from 688 DW ?
Marconi - ''The depth change performance in DW isn't unrealistic, it's dreadful.''
You arent telling me surely that the 688 in DW taking a minute to level out over 20 ft is accurate ?
When the transcript shows the 688 takes '' a minute or so '' to go from 150 ft to Peri. depth !
One assumes that means arrive at periscope deployment depth level and ready to deploy the peri.
I dont think there can be much room for lack of knowledge -
''You would be suprised how much technical details these guys don't know.''
If these areas are 'sensitive' then I can understand and appreciate the need to 'muddy the waters'
and also the need to inaccurately simulate. But I cant imagine that these are such areas of concern.