![]() |
Anti-animal crushing law
I think this is a law pretty much everyone can agree on.
The Prevention of Interstate Commerce in Animal Crush Videos Act of 2010, was signed into law on 9 Dec 10. Public Law 111-294. Quote:
I am probably more kinky that most here on this site and I have a great respect for other people's kinks. But freedom of kink must have limits. :yep: The non-consensual involvement of animals and the senseless and cruel torturing and killing of animals for sexual gratification should not be allowed. While this law does not address the terrible actions themselves, by restricting the interstate sale of videos/graphic depictions, we can start to mitigate the financial portion of this gruesome business. Personally, I felt bad that the 1999 law was declared unconstitutional. But I understood the courts decision. This new law is a start. And a good start. :yep: |
Holy blazing crawdads... I thought it had to do with the poultry industry (the practice of grinding up live chicks for feed). :doh::dead:
|
Wait, people get turn on by that?
or is it the japanese porn companies that are based in the us to avoid the japanese censorship laws |
I'm quite shocked myself!
:o I'd believe anyone that derives a 'Sex kick' out of stomping animals to death, (Large or small) is a potential serial killer. AKA Jeffery Dahmer. :hmmm: |
Reading through the text of the law raises one question: How I interpret it it seems that the making of those vids for your "private entertainment" is still legal? :nope:
I hope that state laws concerning animal cruelty come into play then... Quote:
(Note, so that nobody twists my words: consent needs a certain degree of maturity!) Quote:
I will try to read it, but the juristic language is not always easy to understand, I think many native speakers feel the same. No wonder that every second american is a lawyer - and the other half is in prison :O: |
Quote:
It would be up to the individual states to pass their own laws, which would only apply to intra-state actions. Quote:
The word you are looking for is witting. Witting consent is what is needed. Quote:
The federal law that was declared unconstitutional was 18 U. S. C. section 48. I can understand why it was declared unconstitutional. It was a poorly written law. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode18/...8----000-.html My personal position: Killing animals for food, skins/fur, medical purposes, legal purposes should be acceptable. But the killing or torturing of animals strictly for entertainment purposes should not be allowed. But that's just my opinion. :yep: |
They should amend the law so that any guy who is found buying one of these videos gets his nuts crushed too. By a sledgehammer. Wrapped in barbed wire. Coated in battery acid.
:nope: |
Quote:
|
Think of any activity or any object. Some where there is a person who "likes" it. :yep:
|
"Dude! That's ****** up right there!" /southpark
Hunting can be fun, but getting your danglies all sweaty over chicks squishing puppies and kittens (as examples I've heard of before) with their feet is just wrong on so many levels I can't even begin to list them here. :nope: |
Retracted.
Sorry, didn't even read the content of that bill, only saw the title. That's...pretty disgusting. Rule 34 strikes again? *puke* |
Quote:
:sign_yeah: |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.