SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=202)
-   -   Idea: secret, hidden forward operating bases for refueling and repairs (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=165865)

Drifter 03-22-10 09:31 PM

Idea: secret, hidden forward operating bases for refueling and repairs
 
I have been thinking about creating a campaign mod that adds 'secret, hidden forward operating bases' here and there in Japanese occupied territory, simulating support by local underground networks and coordination through British agents. Location and availability would depend on the year and month. Player sub would be able repair and refuel at these secret locations. I would probably limit the availability of secret, hidden forward operating bases to just one or two at a time. I have been considering creating a mod like this because of the common problem of player running out of fuel due to damage or mismanagement, and no way of calling for help.

Not sure how realistic or gamey this feature might be, but if anyone is interested in a mod like this, please let me know. :DL

Drifter 03-22-10 09:51 PM

Now that I think about it, I guess I could also add a renown penalty for using these secret, emergency bases. Perhaps something like -2,500. Radio messages announcing their availability could also say something like xx Do not use base unless absolutely necessary xx :hmmm:

G2B 03-22-10 10:04 PM

Been pondering the Sub-tender issue myself, for those times your engines just don't work quite right cause of the new sun deck in the engine room complete with swimming pool.

Drifter 03-22-10 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by G2B (Post 1329235)
Been pondering the Sub-tender issue myself, for those times your engines just don't work quite right cause of the new sun deck in the engine room complete with swimming pool.

:haha:

I wouldn't use sub tender ships in enemy-occupied territory. They would be too easy to detect by the Japanese. Rather these bases would represent small villages with docks, having repair equipment and fuel barrels kept hidden in the jungle.

magic452 03-23-10 02:14 AM

Drifter, not a bad idea at all, could add a little something different. I like it.:up: Just refuel, no rearm though if that is possible. Engine repairs only but I don't see how you could do that. Big renown hit.

Magic

Frumpkis 03-23-10 02:41 AM

I like the idea of a forward refueling operation, although to be realistic, it should probably be something like a clandestine offshore rendezvous with a sampan loaded with diesel drums. And refuel only, no engine parts or re-arming.

I can't see a sub commander wanting to actually bring the boat into a coastal port anywhere near occupied territory for this. Too risky, especially when the whole idea of a fleet boat is that it's self-contained for a long patrol and shouldn't really need this sort of thing very often, if at all. On the other hand, random events are a good way to shake up a campaign, so it's a good idea if it doesn't happen too frequently or predictably.

Drifter 03-23-10 04:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by magic452 (Post 1329400)
Drifter, not a bad idea at all, could add a little something different. I like it.:up: Just refuel, no rearm though if that is possible. Engine repairs only but I don't see how you could do that. Big renown hit.

Magic

I agree, although I'm not sure it's possible to only refuel. I think that part is hard-coded.

Drifter 03-23-10 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frumpkis (Post 1329415)
I like the idea of a forward refueling operation, although to be realistic, it should probably be something like a clandestine offshore rendezvous with a sampan loaded with diesel drums. And refuel only, no engine parts or re-arming.

I can't see a sub commander wanting to actually bring the boat into a coastal port anywhere near occupied territory for this. Too risky, especially when the whole idea of a fleet boat is that it's self-contained for a long patrol and shouldn't really need this sort of thing very often, if at all. On the other hand, random events are a good way to shake up a campaign, so it's a good idea if it doesn't happen too frequently or predictably.

It wouldn't represent a coastal port. Rather, a small forward base with a tiny dock that was being kept hidden from the Japanese.

I agree that it would be risky for a sub captain to try and refuel at a secret base like this. That is why I say that it would be used for emergencies only, such as heavy sub damage with major loss of fuel. It would not be considered a regular refueling base. Plus, if used, the captain would take a big renown hit.

TH0R 03-23-10 06:54 AM

A very interesting idea. What is historical background behind this?

Drifter 03-23-10 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TH0R (Post 1329621)
A very interesting idea. What is historical background behind this?

I don't really have any specific historical information for these types of operations. I don't even know if they happened. I was just trying to think of a go-between fix for the player inability to call for help if out of fuel or severely damaged. Maybe someone here has some historical info.

Armistead 03-23-10 10:26 AM

I'm sure some would like it, I doubt I would. You could make it just a refit so only minor repairs. What would be nice if like history there we're a few instances of subs taking fuel from other subs. If you could keep the torps out and limit fuel it may work , just don't think you can.

Sailor Steve 03-23-10 10:38 AM

British and Australian coastwatchers spied on enemy ship movements and radioed them in. There were no secret bases. How would they even get drums of diesel fuel? That would require that some surface supply ship move deep into enemy waters to make the deliveries. It just didn't happen.

Not saying you shouldn't do it. It sounds like fun. Just saying don't imagine it's historical.

danurve 03-23-10 10:51 AM

Alternate Idea
 
What about - what about a rendezvou with another AI US submarine and a transfer of fuel & a few fish instead of a base? That could simulate a milk-cow.

CCIP 03-23-10 11:56 AM

I don't think US boats were equipped to remove/take on torpedoes at sea. They didn't have any external storage, unlike U-boats, and I don't believe they were equipped to extract torpedoes from the hull, except by firing them.

danurve 03-23-10 12:25 PM

I see your point.
But was a US sub able to take on fuel at sea? Alot of times I have the fish to extend a patrol but lack the fuel. And I'm by no means waisting it, or at least trying to be fuel consious.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.