SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Will gamers ever have to upgrade to Vista? (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=132851)

GlobalExplorer 03-11-08 07:17 PM

Will gamers ever have to upgrade to Vista?
 
Who still thinks that gamers will have to upgrade to VISTA?

I am running XP. And have no plans to upgrade whatsoever. Just what annoys me is when people still spread opinions like this:

Whether you like it or not, gamers have to upgrade to Windows Vista sooner or later to enjoy DirectX 10 titles like BioShock or Cyrsis. For this, you need a DirectX10 compliant videocard, and it doesn't hurt if it's HDCP compliant and natively supports HDMI output, Shader Model 4.0, and all manner of High Definition content.

Taken out of context from a review on PCSTATS ;)

It seems a lot of people take for granted that history will always repeat itself. But lets face it, if VISTA happened to be not from Microsoft, it would have tanked. And as it happened to be from them, it is still alive, but it must be the least unopular os in the world.

Actually I dont like MS bashing, they released quite a few very good products ..

Wolfehunter 03-11-08 08:08 PM

MS goal is to axe xp in 2010. By then Vista should be operating perfectly with SP3.5 to the power of 100th:know:

kiwi_2005 03-11-08 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GlobalExplorer
Who still thinks that gamers will have to upgrade to VISTA?

Unless MS next windows is better then yes sooner of later xpgamers will have no choice but move to Vista, same back when Windows98se was the gaming platform most saw winXP as if it was the plaque. XP got slammed the same how Vista is getting slammed today. But in the end we had no choice.

Prediction: by 2011 XP wont be one of the OS's in the minimum sys specs on your new game cover...:hmm:

Letum 03-11-08 08:40 PM

You will need to upgrade to a 64bit OS when you want more than a few gig of ram.

Wolfehunter 03-11-08 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Letum
You will need to upgrade to a 64bit OS when you want more than a few gig of ram.

32bit is finished in my books. Great for writing or emails but Heavy gaming graphic..... Captain she can't handle the pressure. She going to blow.:/\\x:
Next system 64 bit all the way.:up: I'm not a fan of AMD but lately with Intels high preformance chips are 3 times more expensive than five years ago, so I'm going to break my normal comfort zone and switch..:oops: Plain and simple your getting better bang for the buck.:yep:

TteFAboB 03-11-08 09:10 PM

XP is better than Win98, while Vista is not better than XP.

And one of the reasons is that many old stuff will work on XP, while nothing works on Vista, not even stuff made for XP.

Stealth Hunter 03-11-08 11:04 PM

Windows XP is the best all the way around, hands down. Windows 98 was a disappointment, Vista was just about eye-candy and not about functionality. XP is somewhere in between. Also, there just aren't that many games that can run on Vista without some form of tweaking required (even the games that are MEANT for Vista can require tweaking to properly run).

The OS was a disappoinment. Whatever Gates has planned next, I hope it is better than Vista, but I'm not sure. I still hate Macintosh, though... that will never change... Jobbs' machine is a hunk of junk. The Hunter Cressall video pretty much sums it up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqsblO6InjE

JSLTIGER 03-11-08 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stealth Hunter
Windows XP is the best all the way around, hands down. Windows 98 was a disappointment, Vista was just about eye-candy and not about functionality. XP is somewhere in between. Also, there just aren't that many games that can run on Vista without some form of tweaking required (even the games that are MEANT for Vista can require tweaking to properly run).

The OS was a disappoinment. Whatever Gates has planned next, I hope it is better than Vista, but I'm not sure. I still hate Macintosh, though... that will never change... Jobbs' machine is a hunk of junk. The Hunter Cressall video pretty much sums it up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqsblO6InjE

My favorite part of the video:

I like the handle here. That's so you can attach it to a chain and use it as a BOAT ANCHOR!

Friedmann 03-12-08 05:26 AM

I've been running Vista Ultimate x64 since release and haven't had a major issue at all. In fact I really really like it All the scaremongering over Vista is made up by those afraid of change or those trying to run it on ancient machines.

GlobalExplorer 03-12-08 06:01 AM

[quote=Wolfehunter]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Letum
I'm not a fan of AMD but lately with Intels high preformance chips are 3 times more expensive than five years ago, so I'm going to break my normal comfort zone and switch..:oops: Plain and simple your getting better bang for the buck.:yep:

I think you're information is outdated by a year or two. Today the C2 is the king. Have a look at the new Wolfdales. They're maybe the best bang for the buck you ever got.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stealth Hunter
I still hate Macintosh, though... that will never change... Jobbs' machine is a hunk of junk.

I don't like Macs and I usually don't even like people who like macs. But well afterall it's their decision if they prefer to spend twice.

Just compare the people who're in charge. Jobbs is known to be an arrogant s.o.b. Bill Gates is as far as I know a really nice guy.

GlobalExplorer 03-12-08 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Letum
You will need to upgrade to a 64bit OS when you want more than a few gig of ram.

4 gb is a hard limit for 32 bit systems. Unfortunately I also keep hearing that XP by default its rather 2.75 gb.

Wolfehunter 03-12-08 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GlobalExplorer
I think you're information is outdated by a year or two. Today the C2 is the king. Have a look at the new Wolfdales. They're maybe the best bang for the buck you ever got.

Celeron? Or Duocore or quadcores CPU?:hmm:

Not a fan of Celeron.:nope:

JSLTIGER 03-12-08 10:59 AM

C2 = Core 2; C2D = Core 2 Duo (dual core); C2Q = Core 2 Quad (Quad core)

Wolfehunter 03-12-08 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSLTIGER
C2 = Core 2; C2D = Core 2 Duo (dual core); C2Q = Core 2 Quad (Quad core)

Thankyou;)

FIREWALL 03-12-08 11:03 AM

Just to add my 2 cts worth before I've had my morning coffee.:dead:

What OS you use or have and whether it's 32bit or 64bit has alot for some of us to do with what we use our computers for.

Me at 57yo it's strictly for gameing and surfing the net. In other words PURE Fun and Games. :) (had first cup). And so far my homebilt plays the games(sims) just fine for me.

On the other side of the street others use their rig for work. And the type of work they do can have alot of impact on what OS they use and if it's 32 or 64 bit. And gameing on it is a small consideration on why it is so powerful and High End.:D (second cup)

I forgot where I was headed with this. But to sum it up it's a matter of NEEDS and WANTS. IMHO.:know: (FINAL CUP):yep:

Btw Good Morning to All :sunny:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.