SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   Silent Hunter 5 (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=244)
-   -   Ubisoft this is your next Silent Hunter title.. (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=170144)

commandosolo2009 05-25-10 09:26 AM

Ubisoft this is your next Silent Hunter title..
 
To UBI,

We want this and this to be the next Silent Hunter title.

Thank you

Signed: CS2009 and the community *edit: of same minded ppl* :salute:
May 25th 2010 14:30 GMT

SteamWake 05-25-10 09:52 AM

Wait a minute.. I dident sign that. :03:

kylania 05-25-10 10:01 AM

Umm.. yeah, modern sub games "Watch this screen as that blip disappears" doesn't appeal to me.

A strategic version maybe, where you controlled a whole fleet or something.

robbo180265 05-25-10 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kylania (Post 1402767)
Umm.. yeah, modern sub games "Watch this screen as that blip disappears" doesn't appeal to me.

A strategic version maybe, where you controlled a whole fleet or something.

That's my thoughts on the subject too, although I do keep toying with the idea of getting Dangerous Waters - just to make sure.

mookiemookie 05-25-10 10:12 AM

Modern subs... :zzz:

No thanks.

Zedi 05-25-10 11:31 AM

Right.. modern subs and funky weapons.. lulz. Whats next, SH in space? :doh:

scratch81 05-25-10 12:50 PM

But... But... I like the smell of desiel :yep:

Sailor Steve 05-25-10 12:54 PM

What you mean "we", paleface?

commandosolo2009 05-25-10 01:45 PM

fine guys the ubi make a game for the same minded ppl wanting the German sub on F.W., savvy?:arrgh!:;):O:

count +1 for me...

MoN 05-25-10 03:15 PM

I hate NDAs. =/

V.C. Sniper 05-25-10 03:57 PM

ummm.... no.

/thread

Adriatico 05-25-10 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mookiemookie (Post 1402777)
Modern subs... :zzz:

No thanks.

+1 ...hate modern sub warfare.
But in Ubi's determined path to destroy SH brand... nothing would surprise me...:dead:

Highbury 05-25-10 04:16 PM

Modern subs, no fighting unless it is a fictional scenario.. no thanks.

mookiemookie 05-25-10 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adriatico (Post 1403106)
+1 ...hate modern sub warfare.
But in Ubi's determined path to destroy SH brand... nothing would surprise me...:dead:

True. I should have amended my post to say "Another subsim made by Ubi - No thanks"

Fincuan 05-25-10 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Highbury (Post 1403107)
Modern subs, no fighting unless it is a fictional scenario.. no thanks.

Considering Ubi has come up with a subgame based on WW2-turned into a semi-fictional scenario three times in a row I don't find the above negative at all :D

Seriously, almost every game based on the use of modern equipment has to be based on a somewhat fictional scenario because conflicts of proper scale and intensity where such equipment is used are thankfully rare. Falcon 4, LOMAC, Dangerous Waters, OFP, Arma, Arma2, Black Shark(although less fictional than the others) are all great examples of this.

That said IF the Silent Hunter series is ever continued I don't see why they would go modern. SH has always been about WW2 so it wouldn't make any sense to do such a huge leap as late as in sixth member of the series. They could have maybe done it back when the WW2 <-> SH relationship wasn't so strong, but now it's too late. Going backwards to WW1, maybe. The gameplay and the technologies available wouldn't be THAT different, and they've now done both major WW2 submarine campaigns a few times anyway. Another option would be to concentrate on a smaller campaign in much greater detail. Russian subs in the Baltic Sea, British subs in the North Sea and around Norway, etc... In this case a certain amount of fictionality would probably need to be brought in, because to my understanding neither of the above scenarios was quite intensive enough to be the basis of a good computer game, even if plenty of ships were sunk and lives lost.

flag4 05-25-10 05:05 PM

begin at the begining - start with WW1

i feel there is not so much more one can do with WW2. once SH5 is fully functional in a few years time - it is finished. after that it can only be add-ons through super mods like GWX et al.

go for fresh. the history around WW1 subs sims is relatively new: can you imagine the graphics and game play!

SabreHawk 05-25-10 05:26 PM

Hmmm yeah modern warfare and the high tech stuff we have now is nearly useless against what we are fighting now.
What we need now is X-ray vision to see the bombs strapped under the clothing of some poor bastard who has no life and has no reason to live, and every reason to die and leave his no life life behind.

Nuclear subs? Another word for millons of dollars thrown out into the ocean, with nobody to fight out there.

Safe-Keeper 05-25-10 05:50 PM

Would love to patrol Russian waters from our of a Norwegian naval base... but is this really what the SH franchise is all about?

Question 2: do we want, or need, another SH?

Ducimus 05-25-10 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by commandosolo2009 (Post 1402740)
To UBI,

* I* (fixed) want this and this to be the next Silent Hunter title.

Thank you

Signed: CS2009 and the community *edit: of same minded ppl* :salute:
May 25th 2010 14:30 GMT

What makes you so sure there will be another SH title? It could very well be SH5 is the end of the road for the series.

Task Force 05-25-10 06:25 PM

Fact is, its impossiable to go modern if your a average game producer.

First its has a smaller buyer group, and two, Where are you going to get the information on submarines/ships, ya think the german/american/russian navy is just gonna say "oah here, take are infromation of are submarine, yea, some of its classified but who gives a S***. Plus, we dont know how a moden sub will perform in real combat.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.