Myth #1 about Fallout 3 - it has no DRM - WRONG!
 

My copy has SecureROM. I know this because I made an image and loaded it into Daemon Tools so that I didn't have to find the DVD to play it. Well, SecureROM raised its ugly head and said there was a conflict with Daemon Tools on my machine. Nice.

If there is any good news in all this, it is that SecureROM operates like the older versions in that it doesn't take over your machine. It just does a simple check on start-up to see if it's the original DVD.

-S

Over on the official forums, there is a lengthy thread about the DRM with Fallout 3. All in all, it is a rather benign version of SecuROM included with the game (which I don't really have a problem with). This is in stark contrast, however, to the likes of Spore, Mass Effect, and Red Alert 3 which uses the much more draconian form of it (online checks, activation limits, etc.). :x:nope::damn:

Syxx thats why I'm glad I have Mass Effect for the 360, none of that DRM bull****. Just put in the DVD and play.

Looking forward to getting my hands on Fallout 3, might buy it today. Or I might hold off and get Rock Band instead. And before you say Rock Bands been out for over a year, let me just say we Aussies can be a little slow when it comes to getting new games out on time.

*mild forms of copy protection*

Pretty much surprise they never went the full hog in protecting Fallout3, as the game will most likely be on every gamers 'to get' list.

Its not on mine.

question :

If according to Bethesda : "For Fallout 3’s copy protection on PC, we use the same security model as we did for Oblivion - a simple disc check. We only use SecuRom’s disc check functionality for copy protection" , why the choice of using Securom that is also known for some side effect regarding performance and compatibility ?

For "simple" cd check there are way simpler copy protections that have none of those side effects, do not install "services" and drivers, and more importantly for a publisher cost a lot less than the latest Securom software contracts.

Anyways, despite i was looking forward to get it one day, it is now one more game i just added to my boycott list.

What a stupid remark by kiwi_2005, talking about one of the most despised games in history. :roll:

But Fallout 3 doesn't have the cursed install limit, does it?

Despised by who? :p

I'd keep a more objective view there. It seems to be despised by what is essentially a small group of die-hard fans of old Fallout. That's like saying SHIII/IV are one of the most despised games in history based on what some of the staunch SHII adherents say...

No

-S

Never heard of that either. Even the most fervent Bethhaters would agree that their DRM is pretty benign.

What the hell is despised about it,:) I should have this game on my pc this week. So far the reviews ive read about it with best gave it a rating of 10/10 and average an 8. but im hoping i will read a quick review about it here. This game has such high scores that its either blardy good or its crap and the reviewers work for besheda:roll:

What, you don't remember the huge thread here a couple of weeks ago which was basically GlobalExplorer vs. a bunch of other people on whether Fallout 3 sucks or not? :D

Not to invalidate anyone's arguments, but given that most of us have already read them there... can we kind of keep it out of this thread?

Oh, and statistic check here: http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages4/918428.asp

Game has 93% rating over 13 major press reviews so far.

Major press reviewers. :lol:

The type of morons who gave Mount and blade a 69%

major press reviewers my ass

major title, big publisher score: 95% +/- 5%
indy title, strategy / sim that requires reading, learning curve, score: 70 +/- 10%

Rilder, Wolfehunter, etc can you take over here? I think I'm getting a bad rep here if I go on with the bethbashing ..

Ah come on, lighten up guys.

For the record, I'm not even taking any side here. I just wish we'd lighten up over it a little, I mean, obviously no game works for everyone. I have no plans to play FO3 - even assuming I had a computer good enough to play it, I probably wouldn't get it anyway. If anything, I'm more likely to check out the two classic Fallout games - but not before I finish my playthrough of Jagged Alliance 2 :p

Everybody is entitled to their opinion, let's respect that and keep it above bar
here please :yep::D.

There is no need for personal attacks just because somebody does not
share a particular point of view. As CCIP mentioned, lighten up folks.

Also, let's remember to stay on topic as per the OP.


RDP

For gods sake do it! The combat is not as good as in JA2, but still extremely good for a RPG. And the graphics really don't matter after a short adaptation period.

I would start with Fallout 1. The game grabs you from the first minute, when you leave the vault. F2 has a pretty slow and strange beginning, and that was actually the reason I didn't get into it many years ago.

Global Explorer would you buy Elder Scrolls V:hmm:. Aparently its in the making. :rock:

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/article...title-for-2010

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2008...livion-and-on/

I think he made it quite clear that he wouldn't buy any game from Bethesda based on prejudice

Ah, well, everyone's entitled to their own opinions