![]() |
Quote:
Markus |
Quote:
I found the documentry very interesting. |
Quote:
Edit found the link through TarJak Markus |
CH5 JFK'S Secret Killer: The Evidence
http://www.channel5.com/shows/jfks-s...r-the-evidence Unable to fine it on youtube. |
Quote:
However, it does seem astounding that a accidental discharge from a secret service agent's weapon during an assassination attempt ended up being the fatal blow and that a random shot hitting such a relatively small spot ended up being the fatal one. Crazier things have happened in the heat of combat I suppose. I know that diehard conspiracy thoerists hate this explanation because it replaces a vast shadowy cabal with a coincidental tragedy. I also fail to see why the Warren Commision would feel the need to cover up secret service incompetence. The agent in question (Hickey) sure didn't care for the book. :03: |
Actually the truth is that the KGB upset a house cat from New Orleans name of Mr.Bojangles.
You see the KGB worked out a deal with Mr.Bojangles that they would rig it so that Mr.Bojangles and not JFK would receive the Democratic nomination to run for president in 1960. Well the KGB backed out and of course JFK won the nomination not Mr.Bojangles and Mr.Bojangles was very angry at this slight from the KGB and thus began his complex plot. Long story short Mr.Bojangles the cat killed JFK. |
Quote:
His work on calculating the trajectories was also impressive and thorough and again presents a far more compelling picture than either the CT crowd or even the official reports. One question is whether Hickey or the other agents even realised what had happened even quite a bit later. The biggest is if they did would they have been able to keep a lid on it for 50 years. The Warren Commission was full of holes in it's approach to witnesses and who was or wasn't called. Its arguable as to what their motives in their actions in presenting a particular case would have been. I prefer not to speculate as its largely unproductive. One interesting fact that the book points out is that according to the interviewed agents, there was no procedure for the Secret Service team to account for rounds taken out on the job and rounds expended. According to Mennigers enquiries they checked the weapon in and out of the armoury in Washington but that procedure didn't count rounds in or out. As I said earlier the theories are all speculation and that will continue without evidence. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The theory has some weight from a certain source who may have been privy to some inside information. Approximately one year after the assassination, LBJ was quoted as saying to Frank Cormier, White House correspondent that, were he ever killed, it wouldn't be from an assassin's bullet, it would be from a Secret Service agent's mistake--- "I ever get killed, it won't be because of an assassin. It'll be some Secret Service agent who trips himself up and his gun goes off. They're worse than trigger-happy Texas sheriffs. " Maybe he was dropping hints...but that's just idle speculation on my part. There is enough of that already in the JFK assassination universe. |
What I find amazing is the number of witnesses that died after Kennedy was killed. No, I don't believe the number is high as claimed and certainly many died natural causes, but it is strange of the several that had ties to Kennedy that were murdered or blamed on suicide.
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKdeaths.htm |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Frank admits he did clean up the language a bit in some of LJB's more colorful quotes. :03: It does seem odd that other secret service agents weren't on Agent Hickey like white on rice if it did happen. |
Quote:
I agree with Bubblehead, Armistead and the House Select Commmittee on Assassinations findings...not a one man job. "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" is another good film. |
My friends, so far we have only discussed who could have done it. But no one have discussed what could have been the motive(Sorry if I should have missed this, while reading every post in this thread)
Let me hear your proposal on what could have been the motive. Markus |
For a single shooter, the motive is obvious. For a multi-shooter conspiracy, Bubblehead1980 has proposed some reasonable ideas already.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.