Ah, way to go! Somebody has a different opinion than your own and you're quick to call them a racist nut and then hit the report button to boot.

This is a forum of debate, sometimes "heated argument" (as Sailor Steve has said in another thread) and that's all I've been doing. You on the other hand seem to be one of those who can't take the heat and are quick to call foul. Maybe you should excuse yourself from this forum for awhile. All you've managed to do is fling insulting names around after all!

You've done this ever since I mentioned what I do for a living. Seems to me that you have a personal problem with LE! Seems like several on here do. There's even a thread from somebody claiming they were mad at a cop in CA that pulled them over for going 81 on a 65! And they wanted to know why they got pulled.... It's always the "why me" attitude and never "I was wrong". Even here we can see that you're somebody that can't accept any wrong doing on your own part.

BTW, last time I was banned it was a "general purpose" ban because I didn't have the popular opinion of the forum. I didn't really violate any particular rule from what I recall. If I did, then so did everybody else. I never resorted to any name calling and still haven't. While I'm making a legitimate argument on here you're resorting to personal attacks. There's a difference.

You're changing the subject again, and the new one is a topic for a completely different thread. Murdering someone because it is your moral belief that what he has done is murder is indeed a completely different but equally evil league.

No, you were brigged specifically for advocating killing people for the crime of being in the country illegally. That is a big difference.

And while you claim you don't resort to name calling you do have a habit of constantly belittling the intelligence of anyone who disagrees with you, and you do engage in personal attacks more than anyone in these discussions.

A topic that does not need to be started especially as that pretend cop in my opinion is about to be Keelhauled in my opinion anyway.

That is to me a useless observation because neither one of us is in a position to judge the veracity of his claim. I know a small handful of people here personally, and know who and what they really are. The rest I take at face value because I'm not in a position to judge. I'm sure Jim can talk about fellow policemen who should not have been in that position, and others can too.

I only judge people here by what they say here, and nothing more.

I never said that it was right but I view abortionists as murderers. That's just my opinion on that. He tried to compare the WTC to an abortion clinc however. That's what's sad! :nope:

This is what it said.... Looks like the "I don't really know what to ban you with" option. Hmmm, isn't this what people were accusing me of being a bad cop over? Tacking on anything I could to put somebody away for a long time!? :hmmm:

You're one to talk! You do the same thing Steve. Hell, everyone does the same thing on here. Oh, I get it! Zachstar is your friend!

Nope, I haven't really done anything wrong since my ban. Even before my ban all I did was post my opinions about things. They might not have been popular but isn't that funny! In a recent thread people are saying that a person SHOULD have a right to unpopular opinion. Well, everyone but Thorn that is! :har:

You really think you're getting to me with your stupid comments! I'm just laughing away over here! You're going to have to do more than tickle me lover boy! :har:

I did not compare the two. I'm simply saying you can not blame an entire religion for the evil deeds of radicals.

You specifically used bombing abortion clinics in your post! Your comparison was disgusting and offensive no matter how you try to defend it.

Whatever you say pal. To further prove the point you know damn well I was making, here is a quote you may be familiar with.


"Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord."


Guess who!!!

Just so people know what the heck he is going on about most forum software these days has "levels" or points associated with accounts. When a level is exceeded it automatically bans or restricts access.

That is likely the difference between brig and keelhauled. Brig is based on a selection a mod or admin makes. Keelhaul is a traditional ban only an admin can make if I understand the forum software correctly.

The moderators' 'nuclear option' exists for behavior that is so far removed from the boundaries of acceptable action that it merits immediate brig time. The notification cites the examples of pornography, piracy and extreme examples of trolling. This differs from the standard infraction procedure involving layers of point assignment to serve as deterent without necessarily resulting in brig time. There is nothing indecisive or unclear about it.

Not quite everyone. Just a few.

Well, thanks for clarifying that for us! Did anyone else really know? :doh: I sure didn't!

Anyways, I think Zachstar is really reaching here for some moderator support to have me banned. He wants to silence the opposition because apparently his opinion is the only one that should matter on here on SubSim. Just look at the way he put his hand up in my face on one thread and said, "Just go away" like he was the Queen of Sheba or something! :rotfl2:

Interesting. All I did was repeat what the notification actually said.

Looks like everyone tries to debunk everyone else's opinion on here! Zachstar is the only one that runs for moderator help when he's insulted somebody and can't stand that they have an opinion different than his own! :down: