![]() |
It was da' mob; Bobby was makin' waves and when da patsy didn't croak on schedule, in goes Jack Ruby?!!(the real smoking gun) ta finish da' job keep his omerta and die of cancer conveniently; LBJ and the military industrial complex were just 'Collateral beneficiaries' ala Teddy Roosevelt or the Radical Republicans when two previous presidents were whacked"! Business as usual in the land o' the free. I suspect too that the sins of the father(bootlegger Boston thug Joseph P.) were visited on the son(s) here as well...:shucks:
|
I was thinking of starting thread about JFK, however I would first have done this on either Thursday or Friday.
This case have intrigued me a lot, have read books and seen many documentary, even those conspiracy videos(and the funny ones from Red Dwarf) Who's expert on this?? I'm not, so how did it? Was LHO acting by him self? Was LHO, being used as an scapegoat? Was LHO a part of a bigger issue? Some month ago I listen to Coast To Coast and in this show I heard that Hoffa, was erased from the earth because of his knowledge about the assassination of JFK. That was new to me.( of course this information is placed under the suspicious conspiracy stuff) The most intersting book I have read is Jim Garrisons book. Personally I have it hart to believe that LHO acted on his own. Being a part of a group-yes, but alone- no. I have a lot of information from all these books and videos, but what is real and what's not. Is it real that the "tour of Dallas" was changed in the last moment? So instead of driving straight ahead, the car turned to the left and drove down the road on which he was shot? If this is true, how could LHO have know this. So in this case I will not say that Bubble is not that wrong-not this time One thing though It was not a Coup D'etat. Markus |
Quote:
Wash, spin, dry and repeat. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/witnesses.htm Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/route.htm Again people believe what they're told, and don't do the research for themselves. But it's not people believing the government, it's people believing the conspiracy buffs. Here is the front page for the above link, and one of the best ones you'll read. http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm |
I believe this more than any of the "other" theories.
http://video.search.yahoo.com/video/...=p&age=0&&tt=b http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tikka_to_Ride |
Quote:
When the final files are unsealed and something incriminating is found I'll eat my words. However, if nothing new is found I guarantee conspiracy theorist won't. They will scream foul, followed by another round of fresh conspiracy theories. Probably enough to sell books and videos and whatever future media well into the 22nd century. Most of us would be delighted to hear a new theory about who actually killed Kennedy, if not Lee Harvey Oswald. However, what monumentally disappoints us is old information presented as if it were new. Most conspiracism works this way. A new crop of gullible readers devours it and pretends that because it is new to them, it's new to everyone. Maybe I'm a burnout case, but it's forty years on for me and it's all become old hat. |
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/225-230.gif
Here is one of the problem with the "magic bullet" theory. It shatters Connally's right wrist, but he is still holding on to his Stetson with it. http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/jbchit.htm |
We all have an opinion in this issue
It could be right it could be wrong who knows? Are any one of you some kind of expert in the fields that have to do with murder a.s.o(can't remember all these words) I'm not, so I for one will not mock, laugh at an another member here in this thread. I just have hard time to believe that Oswald did it one his own. That's my belief Markus |
Quote:
I doubt that the files opening will reveal anything new anyway and as you pointed out the CT crowd will continue to argue the toss even after they are opened. |
Motive !
Came to think of an detective saying in an episode of FBI-files on Discovery that it was important to find the motive of a crime. So what could be the motive behind the assassination of JFK?? Markus |
Quote:
Quote:
I've seen ample proof that Oswald could have made the shots and could have made the walk that some people have said he couldn't. It may well have been a conspiracy, and Oswald may or may not have been involved. Yes, he could have done it. Those requirements have been satisfied time and time again. That doesn't mean he did. There could have been two or more shooters. Anything is possible. The conspiracy theories have revolved around the idea that he couldn't have done it. He could have. Today they revolve around several contentions that have been shown to be wrong. That means that there doesn't have to be a conspiracy. There still may be, but to me more proof is required. |
Quote:
So you think the mob, government, CIA, etc did it? My answer: NO! I do not know who did it. There's a movie starring Burt Lancaster in the program scheduled for that evening the movie was named 3 bullets( I just can't find that movie on imdb) When I saw this movie, I couldn't help thinking, could this be the reason? Money Just money nothing else. Markus |
Quote:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070046/?ref_=nv_sr_3 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.