![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The early machines tend to be better built (you get what you pay for!) My Dads first VCR ( A VHS) lasted over 15 years, the next lasted 2!:damn: |
So the end has come, the music has stopped, and the poor sod whos been stuck with the HD DVD player is trying to find a way out.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/articles/...467142225.html Thy've got buckleys!;) |
"There is nothing wrong with the products so we aren't accepting returns from customers,''
"They [customers] understood that there were two competing formats and understood that one of them would probably prevail ... so they made the decision to go with HD DVD.'' -That's gotta sting.:lol: |
wont be long till Microsoft have blu ray in there xbox 360's.
|
Quote:
MS will also have to pay Sony for the priviledge. How do them sour grapes taste Gates.:rotfl: Also, following Toshiba's withdrawl from manufacturing HD DVD, they still maintain that BR will loose the war: Quote:
So, a full .mkv HD movie download (@ 720p or 1080p) will hit your bandwidth for about 6-8gb :lol:. Hope you all have fast & unlimited bandwidth ISPs. I don't think we're quite there Tosh but keep dreaming if you want. EDIT - For those worried about their extensive DVD collection, (I assume HD DVD players do this to) BR players (aka my PS3) can & do upscale SD format DVD's to near HD quality. Now, to the keen eye there is a huge difference between BR quality & upscaled DVD's but to the general user, it's very good quality. So, your DVD collections are safe.;) |
Quote:
Your right about your second point, my first one went about 7 years no problems just wore it out. The second one went 5 years with problems and the third one went dead in a year with problems. It's a throw away sociality as the cost is low, I still got two VHS recorders and if they go wrong I will throw them out as there is no point getting them repaired as they now cost £20 to £30. |
Quote:
I also have friends that are bypassing HD DVD and Blu Ray alltogether, and either DL all their content, or have Comcast send it to them. -S |
Until that kind of connection is the basic norm in the major areas of the world, we are nowhere near this kind of HD download content.
This kind of infrastructure and net speed needs to be nationwide before this service takes the lead. For example, the majority of the UK doesn't even have cable connections installed, what chance do they have getting fibre optics.;) However, I will concede that downloadable HD services will spur the industry on to install & develop cable/optical net services. |
Quote:
The phone companies are trying to compete on every level with cable, and plan to send everything from internet traffic, to TV through FIOS. I expect a similar assualt on the cable companies to happen in the UK in the near future. To hear you talk though, I'd have to say the UK even lags behind all other European nations. -S PS. In case you care, FIOS is probably what you already think it is - It is fiber optic. PPS. Some info - http://www22.verizon.com/content/con...s+vs+cable.htm PPPS. I was under the impression that most European nations were beyond the US in broadband speed. PPPPS. Here is the TV channel line-up - kind of shows you that they have stadard cable in their sights - http://www22.verizon.com/content/fio...nel+lineup.htm |
Quote:
London has only just getting FIOS and that's central London. Personally, I'm stuck on 8mb/1mb coming down my phone line and that's on a good day. There's not even a cable infrastructure within 200 miles of me.:damn: I agreee the UK is well behind the rest of the world. ISPs are still charging extortionate rates for net service while advertising speeds that are not obtainable. I pay £24.99 a month for a 30GB (fair usage) monthly cap and I'm lucky if I can maintain 4mb/512kb. LOL Laugh if you must.:rotfl: I welcome FIOS with open arms.:/\\k: |
Well FIOS (which is a Verizon branded name. It will probably be called something else in the UK) is not all its cracked up to be though - my one biggest complaint with it - they block both port 80, port 25, and port 21 which means no web servers except on non standard ports and same goes with no FTP unless it is on non standard ports. SMTP is a no go because of a lacking port 25. They force you to pay more for the biz package if you plan to use those services and host them at home on standard ports.
I can sort of see why though - 5 MBit/sec upload would / will make a great server pipe. -S |
Quote:
|
Quote:
-S |
In all honesty I could care less at this format war. Technology progresses too fast anymore and optical media will be a thing of the past a few years down the road. I will eagerly look forward to IPTV and the benefits it will bring.
|
That's kinda the point as I see it. For most people, digital download is still a few, if not many years away. So enjoy today's tech in the meantime. When we finally attain as a whole, those sorts of speeds, they ain't gonna be free. Not here anyway.
|
I see IPTV as quite common in about 10 years. It will take a while to catch on but we are seeing the birth of it now as TV networks begin to offer their shows on the web. I think a lot of the writers guild strike concessions probably set the writers up to get money from new outlets as they become commonplace. Once more and more people begin to catch on that they aren't limited to watching a TV show when the network broadcasts it will change many peoples lives. Tivo and DVRs have begun the revolution.
Our children will laugh at us when we tell them we got our tv through dedicated cable services or big analog broadcast antennas and bought movies in stores on DVDs. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.