SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Kilo Improved SS. [Rookie Captain question]

Page 2 of 3

Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- Dangerous Waters (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=181)

- - Kilo Improved SS. [Rookie Captain question] (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=87224)

LuftWolf

12-09-05 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molon Labe

If you consider detections of an Akula crawling around slowly at a range of over 30nm realistic, then sure. :-?

Molon, that's why they call Convergence Zones "Convergence Zones"....

Bellman

12-09-05 11:02 AM

:lol: ML: What matters with C in Cs Home is not de facto but de jure culpability. :rotfl:

SKeem: Did I see booty ? :yep: ;)

Bellman

12-09-05 11:04 AM

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

LW: SKeems got the "Convergence Zones' just about right .................................................. .for me. :lol: :rock: :up:

LuftWolf

12-09-05 11:20 AM

"Mr. Vasilley, confirm our range to moderators. One ping only."

Bellman

12-09-05 11:25 AM

:o :huh: :stare: :roll: :lol:

Molon Labe

12-09-05 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LuftWolf

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molon Labe

If you consider detections of an Akula crawling around slowly at a range of over 30nm realistic, then sure. :-?

Molon, that's why they call Convergence Zones "Convergence Zones"....

There needs to be a signal at that range to converge. I don't think the Ruskies have been loud enough for that ever since they stole our quieting technology. Ships, older subs, maybe even modern subs putting on the steam--sure. Anyways, if there is an expert counter to this, post it over in the "layers" thread, let's give this one back.

Molon Labe

12-09-05 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bellman

:lol: ML: What matters with C in Cs Home is not de facto but de jure culpability. :rotfl:

SKeem: Did I see booty ? :yep: ;)

Oh really? What law?

Kiwi Zero Six

12-09-05 02:43 PM

Good golly, Miss Molly.

kiwi_2005

12-09-05 02:54 PM

Quote:

The patch greatly lengthens detections is some cases and greatly reduces them in others.

This is because the 1.03 patch is a complete overhaul of the sound propagation model. It now functions very realistically and has wide set of environmental parameters that influence detection ranges.

For a rookie russkie kilo pirate :) should i have this patch or would it be better for me to go back to the standard game. Ive just started playing with autocrew off since i updated to 1.03, so i wouldn't know if it would of been easier without the patch.

nice photo Skeem :rotfl:

Deathblow

12-09-05 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LuftWolf

"Mr. Vasilley, confirm our range to moderators. One ping only."

:lol:

Quote:

Originally Posted by kiwi

For a rookie russkie kilo pirate should i have this patch or would it be better for me to go back to the standard game. Ive just started playing with autocrew off since i updated to 1.03, so i wouldn't know if it would of been easier without the patch

Might as well practice with the patch. Doesn't really change the basic gameplay all that much, just fixes some bugs and reintroduces others (like diving rates).

Ohio subs are pretty quiet. You might want to practice against something louder like the Xia.

LuftWolf

12-09-05 06:07 PM

Quote:

nice photo Skeem

Not if you happen to view the thread at work. :stare: :damn:

kiwi_2005

12-09-05 10:28 PM

Code:

Ohio subs are pretty quiet. You might want to practice against something louder like the Xia.[quote]



Ahh is that why i couldn't keep a track on him... sneakie bastard.



excuses, excuses :arrgh!: [/quote]

kiwi_2005

12-09-05 10:31 PM

Quote:

Not if you happen to view the thread at work

Ah yeah viewing pictures of half naked woman at work is not a good idea :D

Especially if the boss is female and shes standing behind you. :huh:

Bellman

12-09-05 11:04 PM

I agree with goldorak when he wrote elsewhere :

Quote:

You people are just too serious :-j

This thread with its juxtoposition of earnestness and sheer frivolity is just very, very funny. :rotfl:

Yep - a minor classic. Thanks to all who sailed in her - whooops sorry, not PC. :-j

Bellman

12-10-05 12:07 AM

ML:

Quote:

Oh really? What law?

The Law of Survival ? :lol:
But I was joking (?) on such a serious topic as the ancient 'Battle of the sexes' and hoped
that you would appreciate, that 'de jure' was the female perspective, whilst recognising
that implicit in the phrase ''C in C House'' was the male 'de facto' acceptance of reality. :rotfl:

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 AM.

Page 2 of 3

Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page