![]() |
Singapore selects F-15T over Rafale
Quote:
:D * JFS (wait and don't see!) |
Quote:
One other item to remember about Singapore's requirements is that they were looking for an aircraft with "ground pounding" capability, because these aircraft are replacing the ancient A-4s Singapore is using now for that role. The F-15T is essentially an upgraded F-15E Strike Eagle, and thus is outstanding in that area. The Rafale is good for this as well, but it simply lacks the payload and range of the F-15. The Eurofighter right now essentially has no ground attack capabilitity, because of the "Tranched" capability implementation schedule, and it's full capabilities won't be available until 2010. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Having two good products doubles the chances of a sale. |
I understand what capitalism is TLAM.
Quote:
Quote:
|
France was part of the original EFA group but dropped out to go it alone.
I also think this idea of going for UCAVs is daft. The concept that they would be throw away mass attack craft has gone and instead they are looking likely to cost as much as a fully manned fighter plane. Talk about reinventing the wheel. Some idiot in the British govt once upon a time thought all fighting would be done by missiles, and so a load of gret world beating projects were cancelled. Yes UAVs have their place and so do UCAVs but to replace a manned strike fighter with a UCAV is madness. The Tornado replacement the FOA - Future Offensive Aircraft has now turned to looking at UCAVs to fulfill the requirement. Big mistake as the UCAV will end up being large enough to put a man in it just by the nature of teh range/bombload requirements. You know what will happen then. Some bright spark will go "Hey, we can put a guy in one of those things, have aman in the loop (again) so they'll spend millions to see how to fit a cockpit and everything else with it. |
Quote:
I consider developing and buying a $60+ million platform for Europe to be total idiocy. There will be peace in Europe for a long time to come, if not forever. Which means you are building your armed forces around peacekeeping. A fighter bomber is overkill for that role. If you can get your UCAV for under $25 million what's the point in buying a hugely expensive fighter bomber? And BTW, the only way that Europe will be able to beat JSF sales is marketing a cheap UCAV IMO. |
Quote:
:up: My only question is: does every nation agree on this? Also neighbouring states like Syria, Iran, the former Soviet republics? At the beginning of the XXth Century people had the same thoughts, but Europe failed miserably... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wouldn't take peace in Europe as granted - only as more likely than a new great war. Currently. |
Quote:
The Eurofighter is not really faring much better than the Rafale in the export market. Last I checked, the only country outside the original consortium (Britain, Germany, Italy, Spain) to have ordered any is Austria, and they're not buying all that many. |
peace in europe huh ????
thats not what i saw in bosnia in 1999 if that was peace cor i dread to think what war is :o |
So you all think Europe playing a supporting role again in the next AF would be accomplished best by the EF/Rafale?
And it was Kosovo in 1999, Kapitain. Not Bosnia. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.