I guess that "questions and comments welcome" only applied to people who don't point out problems with things you haven't taken into account.

Where did you claim to 'correct a 3D model?' Just look at the quote above and read it from the standpoint of a new or inexperienced user.

The only thing crappy here is your coprophagic bad attitude and total inability to accept a statement that is completely USEFUL.

You have indeed created a bad mod given that you've claimed it is compatible with GWX when it most certainly is not. Your mod as it stands can create SERIOUS problems for individuals using GWX.

You've adjusted one element but have broken numerous others that may cause CTD's in the right circumstances. THAT is why you need to begin with GWX filework as your base if you intend to claim 'compatability' with GWX... and THAT is why GWX devs such as myself may step in where overall/greater functionality is concerned. Historical accuracy in a simulator comes SECOND to stability. (...and you asked what I'm sniffing.)

Furthermore, the T5 Zaunkonig becomes available IN-BASE at the appropriate time in GWX, allowing GWX users to employ T5's WITHOUT a mod!!! (October 1943)

At any rate, if you aren't happy about our "crappy" torpedo loadout for ONE SUB on ONE YEAR in GWX... you can always sue to get the money back that you paid the GWX team to download it.

This guy from the Republic of Texas... that apparently doesn't know diddley about U-boats... only had several thousand other elements to be concerned with that were required to be FUNCTIONAL in-game with GWX relating to the ENTIRE U-boat war. If the torpedo loadout for one boat and one year... that users can SELF CORRECT... fell through the cracks... BIG DEAL.

alright... no problem at all. Thats different. I'll make one for GWX, no big deal. The one I have works just fine... and it does not take much to make it compatible with one mod or the other.

Another error from stock SHIII was the incorrect heavy AA canons. They were reversed. Take a look at the above photos and you'll see that they are now correct.
Make any changes you want,.. this mod is not copyrighted. ill release another one just so this guy stops whining

now you are 'talking' Anton88 ! if you use as base the gwx's basic.cfg ( and take as given that your personal tweaks are correct) i think that there will be no problem at all. one version for wac and one for gwx ( and don't forget the great nygm also ,if you have some time make one version for each)

i have never look at guns of subs...etc so my opinion has no value at all

LOL! Your just mad because you were called to account for shoddy work.

You may not respect all the work here that came before your little 'adjustments' to various mods... but you will be called on to face it when you act like the bull in the china closet.:shucks: That methodology won't work for you here and it will only burn bridges you may need later.

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...48#post1195448

Bull in the China closet? Is that an expression from "the republic of Texas"?
Never heard it before. Can most people over there even find China on the map?

I appreciate your hard work and dedication with the GWX project, but even you, the expert was not able to come up with the solution for the gun-problem...solve it, and release it in one of your super mods.
You know everything about the Basic.cfg file and how to edit it..
then why didn't you -the U-boot expert- fix this bug, and instead let a mod newbee like me do it? Why didn't you realize the uboat hull was incorrect,..why didn't you notice the guns were reversed .. (tga images).
Why don't you make corrections to the Deck gun, and Periscopes so that they have that twisty thing that's wrapped around them.. (like it has in WAC 4.1). You should work on things like these that make the game more historical collrect and realistic,..instead of criticizing the hell out of someone who tries to improve it.
You said my mod screws up your late-war sensors stuff..

The mod I did makes the IXC uboot look like this: Thats for 1942 and 1943 period.. after that you no longer need it. Having late war sensors together with this mod is kind of pointless, dont you think?
You want to install a schnorchel on the boat below? In 1942?? :wah:
http://www.histarmar.com.ar/InfHisto...507Black03.jpg

Not once in all my days here, have I ever claimed to be a "U-boat expert." I'd really like to be, but I'll never claim it.

Hell, I've never even SEEN an actual submarine and I am land-locked for hundreds of miles in every direction.

So count all the rivets you wish. Armchair "experts" like you are a dime a dozen anyway. With anything under the sun... if you look deep enough, you'll find a bit of tarnish or rust.

I didn't have the luxury of total focus on any one aspect of the mass of material that is covered in GWX with the intent to engineer the entire U-boat War...

... apart from one thing that I do claim to have pushed harder for than anything else....


Without it... EVERY detail of every mod is pointless and wasted.

Surely, even genius Romanian guys like you understand that. (Unlike you, I don't feel the need to imply that 'stupidity' is geographically sensitive. ... and speakin' fer us dummmb Texans... I seem to recollect that one 'o them there dumb Texans owns this here site. Yup he beeult eeyut ahll bah hiself he deeyud! So ahh reckun he's a purdy smart Texan... Ah think that maybe he's even studied books an' stuff. Ain't that uhhhmayzin'? Gyuk gyuk! :88) He even lets them wierd Ruhmayneeans from up north o' Canuhduh type stuff on here. Cuz they're all smart ya know? Deeud yoo know thayut they eeet their babehs up thar in Ruhmayneea? They shore do.)

Furthermore, if you've followed matters concerning GWX... you'd know that we have made our final release.... right, wrong, or indifferent. You haven't the foggiest idea, just how difficult that has been to execute.

... and YEP... this dumb 'expert' from the Republic of Texas... thinks the whole team did a damn fine job in uncountable ways.

So you can keep showing your ass and mocking the land I live in, me, GWX, being defensive, whatever. You wouldn't have the courage to say it all to my face anyway.

GWX has TWO basic.cfgs at any rate. Think about that. Since you are so sharp. I'm sure you can help yourself. In the meantime, GWX users shouldn't employ your works because until you've followed the recommendations already stated to you... they can expect serious problems with their installations.

Your thread was initially interesting to me... because I hate missing details, but now I just don't give a rip. You're a common, run-of-the-mill jerk. (The kind of guy I'd have kicked off of the team in a heartbeat, regardless of whatever you might know.)

I'm done talking to you. So enjoy having the last word. I'm sure it will be scathing and oh-so-nasty.:|\\

Sooooo......hows them Dallas Cowboys :yeah:

http://www.dallascowboys365.com/uplo...ers-774956.jpg

http://www.girlroster.com/wp-content...eerleader1.jpg

I don't know about finding China on a map, but we certainly know how to take constructive criticism without throwing a temper tantrum.

Anton (putting aside the differences between you and KL for a moment).

You have been cordially advised by the GWX Project Manager that your work IS NOT COMPATIBLE with GWX.

Whether you agree or not is it not sensible to make further efforts in investigating the true position.

At the very least is it not wise to warn people there are concerns in some quarters that the work you have created may have a detrimental impact on their GWX installation.

I'm confident you'll reconsider and agree with me when I say "The community deserves nothing less"