to be honest, the big problem with using DNA to solve a crime, is that unless the person has already comitted a crime, their DNA is NOT on record. this fatal flaw leaves the chance for a brutal crime to pass as either unsolved, or very hard to solve simply because they may not have ever comitted a crime, leaving the investagotors to have to do it the hard way

DNA evidence will only really work like it is suppose to if EVERYONE has their DNA on record. Yes, it may seem wierd, but this is the correct course of action

at least, that is how it works in the US

but thats my opinion, and it seems people think my opinions are weird. I would be willing to submit DNA, because I know I would never hurt anyone (well, not everyone on earth....there are a few I would like to get my hands on.) I would be willing to pay taxes so everyone could have health care, and I would be willing to pay taxes to turn the rusted SS United States into a world class hotel and Museum in New York. Call me strange, but its who I am

If it stops some of the hideous crimes individuals commit against each other it's gotta be worth it.

I have no problem with it either. At what age should we start worrying about kids commiting crime?

http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/disp...entPK=20175431

PS - Knipper - I moved out of Bath a few years ago, but still work there. Do you have a local?

Age of criminal responsibility in the UK is 10 years of age....Sadly, some commit serious crimes before that. :nope: