![]() |
If they do make a SH5 I'm hoping they go back to the Atlantic/Med but with a twist instead of U boats they do allied subs, RN and USN boats. Would be cool to lurk outside Brest or St Nazaire and fire a spread of fish at a passing U boat seting out on patrol or returning.
|
Quote:
|
No matter what theater, any new WWII subsim will have to be a major improvement on what we already have, or else what's the point?
|
I hope that they make a destroyer vs sub game like DC/SH2
|
I will not buy a tarted up version of SH3 just to give some smuck the satisfaction of ripping people off. SH5 has to be a radical new game, say where you can play all sides in subs and destroyers along with a merchant too. Or so take charge as the boss deploying your subs and destroyers taking the decisions where to send them in the real war and a what if situation.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'd like to see this Naval model expanded so players can take control of a variety of vessels (a la GNBNA) on campaigns that best represent the experience on each class. Wouldn't it be fun to drive a River Class frigate? How about HMS Hood? Heck, with AI improvements one could control an entire wolf pack at once. Now that's immersion!
All this would be possible with a simple addition to the engine: user created vessles. Ship a few with the game and give modders an SDK so they can create their own ships. |
DX10 beta for non Vista OS available for download here:
http://www.technospot.net/blogs/down...-alky-project/ Don't know anything about it, could be great then again might be crap!:yep: Quote:
|
If SHV was in the pacific and a Japanese sub commander sim, I would be the first to buy it. If not, going back to the atlantic would improved environments and interfaces would be good as well. The reason why the new games with the same premise are bought is because it's a significant improvement over the previous. SH2 was complete crap, yet SHIII was a masterpiece. If 3 years from now it's worth forking over 40 bucks for a vastly improved version of the game.
|
Quote:
I'm running it on xp with no problem why would you say that? |
Is that the same as I mentioned panzer 49th, or is it a full install?:) if so could you please give a link?:yep: Thanks.
|
If it is dose come out in a year I think that there will be problems worse than SHIV. :nope:
UBI PLEASE LISTEN LET THE DEVS TAKE THERE TIME WE WANT A WORKING GAME!!! :damn: |
If they're going to release another game that's riddled with bugs and has clearly been shoved out the door too soon, then I hope at least they make it a far more easily moddable/customizable.
I also think they should put far more thought into the strategy, realism & AI aspects of the game, and far less effort into the graphics. Graphics are fine and all, but the graphics were good enough in the original Silent Hunter in my view, and the game ran far better than SH3 or SH4 which require ludicrous amounts of CPU/GPU resources for what they deliver. The original Silent Hunter required only 8MB of RAM, and delivered a playing experience virtually identical to SH4 minus the flashy graphics whose effect on the player wear off after a few weeks anyway. I'd also love to see a game that portrayed the entire WW2, playable as a sub skipper from the British, German, Japanese or American perspective. In any event, bringing out a new game that is basically has identical gameplay to SH1 (yet again) but simply with a newer, flashier graphics engine will not cut it in my view. They need to add something new to keep things interesting, like they added crew management in SH3. It would be really nice somehow if you were able to better see the effects of your sub's performance on the war itself. |
Quote:
have flashy Graphics have 1 nation playable be released unfinnshed Thats just the way it is, look at SH3 and 4, why would SH5 get the special treatment all of a sudden? Same meat different gravy, you can count on it from Ubi - not always a bad thing though. Ubi will never allow the same amount of time and budget to on an SH title as say - a Tom Clancy release) there is just not enough return on it for them.... for this reason they may never be an SHV, I guess i depends how well SH4 has done. I dont really like the Pacific but i bought SH4 anyway, need to support the franchise if nothing else. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.