![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Economic case for Scottish independence
An interesting view http://reportingthereferendum.blogsp...ependence.html |
Go for it....no currency, no automatic right to NATO membership or the nuclear acceptance that goes with it, no automatic acceptance to the EU, oil and gas demand at an all-time low for three years.
Good luck....the Scottish population is worth more than that. Don't forget to post here in a year or two. |
A writer here in SA wrote this very witty intro to his piece on the up coming vote. His article is well worth a read.
"In thinking about this upcoming Scottish independence vote, it is pretty ironic that the archetypical British secret agent was portrayed on film by an ardent Scottish nationalist – Sean Connery, while Scotland’s great hero of the 13th century, William Wallace, was played by a misanthropic Aussie actor, Mel Gibson. These are just some of the curious ironies of the impending independence referendum-taking place in Scotland on Thursday." http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/artic.../#.VBgZcZSSzSs |
Two days to go...until I find out if I need to buy a new atlas.
But then considering that its copyright date is 1977 and it still has both the Soviet Union and the Central African Empire among other outdated nations on its pages, maybe I need an upgrade anyway. :-? |
After seeing Cameron make a fool of himself yesterday I suspect a growing number of the English are now hoping for a YES vote.
|
A 51 to 49 percent "decision" is not the right way to decide about this .. :hmmm:
|
Win or lose this will be the last time this matter should come up.
The class system in the UK extends to poor people in Scotland, right? How can the poor people of Scotland be assured of continuing to get a welfare check or at the least have to qualify all over again? The rich will have to pay more taxes in Scotland to support the poor ... :yep: |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Here's Slovenia's referendum in 1990
Quote:
THIS is a nation wanting independence, 50/50 is politics playing on the sentiments if citizens. |
Yep, 49-51 (or a Quebec 1995 result) is too close. Something like this should have been set at a minimum threshold of two thirds.:hmmm:
Unfortunately, there are still strong memories of the result of the 1979 referendum, a Yes but below a set threshold: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottis...ferendum,_1979 "The result was a narrow majority in favour of devolution. However, Parliament had set a condition that 40% of the registered electorate should vote "Yes" in order to make it valid. The amendment to the Bill which set this condition was moved by George Cunningham, the Scottish-born Labour MP for Islington South and Finsbury. Thus, despite a turnout of over 60%, devolution was not enacted since less than 40% of electorate voted yes. The Scotland Act 1978 was repealed in March 1979 by a vote of 301-206 in the UK House of Commons." Mike.:hmmm: |
Quote:
|
A Yes vote isn't a vote for independence, it's to start negotiations. That'll be the toughest part for all concerned and a worrying time for those who decided at the last minute.
|
Tomorrow there's going to be party anyway, right? :D The only question is will the beer glass be half full or half empty?
:O: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.