It was only a matter of time....

[DetCord]

http://i.imgur.com/Ho9mzdC.png

[MadMike]

Heh heh. :up:

Care to add SUBROC, ASTOR (or even an ASTOR w/conventional warhead)?

The Soviets had a full range of nuclear depth bombs, torpedoes, ASM's, SSM's, sub and ship launched rockets, atomic demolitions for Naval Spetsnaz, etc.

Yours, Mike

[tn_prvteye]

Will I still have to fire 10 of them get a mission success?

[Steiger]

Will I still have to fire 10 of them get a mission success?

LOL. I imagine firing 1 would be a mission failure, owing to the whole planetary destruction angle...

[caine007]

That hill outside Murmansk is SO dead.

[DetCord]

Will I still have to fire 10 of them get a mission success?

Nah, I altered the damage ratio from 845 to 8500. :03:

LOL. I imagine firing 1 would be a mission failure, owing to the whole planetary destruction angle...

It'd be a fairly large escalation...

[max-peck]

Only someone called DetCord could come up with something like this:03:

I can imagine the conversation with WEPS
What's the explosive power of these things?
845 sir
Hmm, gonna need more
Much more

[MadMike]

We had nuke's in the very low kiloton range (37 tons and up), mainly artillery fired atomic projectiles. Davy Crockett was about 20 tons. Not my specialty, I worked on strategic and tactical bombs (not to mention explosives and demolitions). Det cord is your friend.

Any one thought of implementing the NT-37 torpedo? It was fielded in 1975, range 19,000 yds, speed 32 knots, warhead 330 lbs HBX. Mk 48's are fine for the 1984 campaign, but I like a little bit of a challenge (lol).

Yours, Mike

[Killerfish Games]

That hill outside Murmansk is SO dead.
I lol'ed at that!