What homosexual marriage brings you

[SUBMAN1]

The next evolution in stupidity:

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/06/08/i_now_pronounce_you____friend_and_friend?mode=PF

-S

I now pronounce you . . . friend and friend

Some argue it's time to legally recognize the bond of friendship

[nikimcbee]

So, when i go up to Seattle, do I need to bring a ring then? I'm confused.

[Digital_Trucker]

Cool. If they legally recognize friendship, I'll be able to write off my other 3 personalities:rotfl:

[nikimcbee]

And when i meet Jimbuna at the subsim meeting, that will really be awkward. So, will I be cheating on everybody else?

I guess it's not really a "love triangle" but a " friendship quadrilateral.":hmm:

I really need to diagram this out.:know:

[CCIP]

To ease the paperwork, you could simply export your facebook friends lists to the appropriate government agency :88)

[SteamWake]

Cool. If they legally recognize friendship, I'll be able to write off my other 3 personalities:rotfl:

Well cool I just picked up a couple of dependants as well :sunny:

[nikimcbee]

Then there's me and Steed.
http://cutepuppies.bulldoginformation.com/Boston-terrier-and-english-bulldog.jpg

[Stealth Hunter]

The next evolution in stupidity:

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/06/08/i_now_pronounce_you____friend_and_friend?mode=PF

-S

I now pronounce you . . . friend and friend

Some argue it's time to legally recognize the bond of friendship



FFS, could you be any more intolerant?:roll:

First the Atheists, now the gays.

[Frame57]

Then there's me and Steed.
http://cutepuppies.bulldoginformation.com/Boston-terrier-and-english-bulldog.jpgPlease! Just do not sniff each others butts...:D

[Stealth Hunter]

Then there's me and Steed.
http://cutepuppies.bulldoginformation.com/Boston-terrier-and-english-bulldog.jpg

I like that photo.:up:

[nikimcbee]

Then there's me and Steed.
http://cutepuppies.bulldoginformation.com/Boston-terrier-and-english-bulldog.jpgPlease! Just do not sniff each others butts...:D

I think we can be descrete.

[August]

The next evolution in stupidity:

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/06/08/i_now_pronounce_you____friend_and_friend?mode=PF

-S

I now pronounce you . . . friend and friend

Some argue it's time to legally recognize the bond of friendship


FFS, could you be any more intolerant?:roll:

First the Atheists, now the gays.

Geez grow a sense of humor will you?

[Morts]

The next evolution in stupidity:

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/06/08/i_now_pronounce_you____friend_and_friend?mode=PF

-S

I now pronounce you . . . friend and friend

Some argue it's time to legally recognize the bond of friendship



FFS, could you be any more intolerant?:roll:

First the Atheists, now the gays.
dont forget us who dont agree with him, the commies !

[clive bradbury]

Much of this is just a none story - how many friends would be bothered to 'legalise' their friendship? Who cares? I don't really follow subman's implied objections to gay marriages, either. Again, who cares?

One aspect of the 'friends' piece did interest me, though, where one supporter stated that the right to take time off work to look after a friend who was ill should be introduced. I assume the inference is that you can already do this for a partner or relative - how would I know - I'm self-employed!

Well, isn't this a good idea? How many single old people have no one to help when they are ill? Wouldn't they benefit from a friend who could take a few days off work to help? Seems quite a nice humanitarian suggestion to me.

[Konovalov]

Good post Clive. :yep:

Who cares? No harm to me. Doesn't impact me. Whats the big deal?

[Jimbuna]

And when i meet Jimbuna at the subsim meeting, that will really be awkward. So, will I be cheating on everybody else?

I guess it's not really a "love triangle" but a " friendship quadrilateral.":hmm:

I really need to diagram this out.:know:

Well I'm hoping to make a few friends so perhaps I should bring a Minister and a Lawyer along with me :lol:

[Konovalov]

And when i meet Jimbuna at the subsim meeting, that will really be awkward. So, will I be cheating on everybody else?

I guess it's not really a "love triangle" but a " friendship quadrilateral.":hmm:

I really need to diagram this out.:know:

Well I'm hoping to make a few friends so perhaps I should bring a Minister and a Lawyer along with me :lol:
:lol: :lol: Don't ya hate the red tape these days. It used to be oh so simple years ago. :88)

[mrbeast]

Much of this is just a none story - how many friends would be bothered to 'legalise' their friendship? Who cares? I don't really follow subman's implied objections to gay marriages, either. Again, who cares?

One aspect of the 'friends' piece did interest me, though, where one supporter stated that the right to take time off work to look after a friend who was ill should be introduced. I assume the inference is that you can already do this for a partner or relative - how would I know - I'm self-employed!

Well, isn't this a good idea? How many single old people have no one to help when they are ill? Wouldn't they benefit from a friend who could take a few days off work to help? Seems quite a nice humanitarian suggestion to me.

Well said Clive!:up:

This thread was yet another example of Subman's, misleading, right-wing propaganda spam campaign.

[Sailor Steve]

And when i meet Jimbuna at the subsim meeting, that will really be awkward. So, will I be cheating on everybody else?

I guess it's not really a "love triangle" but a " friendship quadrilateral.":hmm:

I really need to diagram this out.:know:

Well I'm hoping to make a few friends so perhaps I should bring a Minister and a Lawyer along with me :lol:
Okay, changed my mind. I'm not going!:nope: :dead:

[Jimbuna]

And when i meet Jimbuna at the subsim meeting, that will really be awkward. So, will I be cheating on everybody else?

I guess it's not really a "love triangle" but a " friendship quadrilateral.":hmm:

I really need to diagram this out.:know:

Well I'm hoping to make a few friends so perhaps I should bring a Minister and a Lawyer along with me :lol:
Okay, changed my mind. I'm not going!:nope: :dead:

ROFLMAO :rotfl:

http://img103.imageshack.us/img103/4726/hirsch07pr7.gif

[AVGWarhawk]

Cool. If they legally recognize friendship, I'll be able to write off my other 3 personalities:rotfl:

Hehe good one DT :rotfl:

[Digital_Trucker]

Cool. If they legally recognize friendship, I'll be able to write off my other 3 personalities:rotfl:
Hehe good one DT :rotfl:
It wasn't a joke :shifty:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:rotfl:

[nikimcbee]

And when i meet Jimbuna at the subsim meeting, that will really be awkward. So, will I be cheating on everybody else?

I guess it's not really a "love triangle" but a " friendship quadrilateral.":hmm:

I really need to diagram this out.:know:

Well I'm hoping to make a few friends so perhaps I should bring a Minister and a Lawyer along with me :lol:
When I read this, this was my response:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trd5oV0pUwk&feature=related


Goooaaall!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFrMSzoLXIU
:rotfl:

[SUBMAN1]

So, when i go up to Seattle, do I need to bring a ring then? I'm confused.Hell no! :D

-S

[SUBMAN1]

The next evolution in stupidity:

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/06/08/i_now_pronounce_you____friend_and_friend?mode=PF

-S

I now pronounce you . . . friend and friend

Some argue it's time to legally recognize the bond of friendship


FFS, could you be any more intolerant?:roll:

First the Atheists, now the gays.
Geez grow a sense of humor will you?Besides that, analyze who is 'intolerant'. Hahahahaha! I could never hope to compete with either group you mention Stealth Hunter! :D They take intolerance to new levels never seen before in history!

All I'm pointing out, if you really want to know, is not the fact that friends want a legal friendship as you think, but actually what these people have 'reduced' marriage to.

As they say, don't shoot the messenger.

-S

[Sailor Steve]

You've never been "just the messenger". It's your own message, and you carry it with relish.

[McBeck]

All I'm pointing out, if you really want to know, is not the fact that friends want a legal friendship as you think, but actually what these people have 'reduced' marriage to.

As they say, don't shoot the messenger.

-S
In my mind they have not reduced it - you still have a choice to live your marriage as you used to. They have not imposed their view on marriage on you

[joegrundman]

Besides that, analyze who is 'intolerant'. Hahahahaha! I could never hope to compete with either group you mention Stealth Hunter! :D They take intolerance to new levels never seen before in history!


He's off again. :roll:

[Morts]

The next evolution in stupidity:

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/06/08/i_now_pronounce_you____friend_and_friend?mode=PF

-S

I now pronounce you . . . friend and friend

Some argue it's time to legally recognize the bond of friendship


FFS, could you be any more intolerant?:roll:

First the Atheists, now the gays.
Geez grow a sense of humor will you?Besides that, analyze who is 'intolerant'. Hahahahaha! I could never hope to compete with either group you mention Stealth Hunter! :D They take intolerance to new levels never seen before in history!

sorry to tell ya (not really) but you already are, and you're doing "better" than them
from what i can read from your posts you seem to be some old white dude, sitting on his front porch yelling at everything then goes inside and curses at the commies, gays and everything else that doesnt fit your mindset followed by a quick prayer to god in hopes of him destroying communism and gay people

[UnderseaLcpl]

Ya know, if the state wasn't permitted to be involved in mariages and they were considered to be a strictly religious issue, we wouldn't even have to worry about this junk.

I take that back. Some people would worry, but no one would have to care. :roll:

[NealT]

Cool. If they legally recognize friendship, I'll be able to write off my other 3 personalities:rotfl:
Hehe good one DT :rotfl:
It wasn't a joke :shifty:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:rotfl:

You only have 4 total? I was told it was much more than that!

Seriously, I wonder if there would be all of the flap if

(1) ancient (meaning old and not archaeic) religious beliefs were not involved and
(2) insurance benefits were not at stake.

[lesrae]

A couple of gay friends of mine had a civil wedding ceremony and had to state to the registrar beforehand that they met various conditions, including that they weren't blood relatives.

"Why?" asked one "We're hardly likely to reproduce, are we?"

The registrar had no answer to that :)

[Digital_Trucker]

NealT 3 out 4 of my personalities thought that was funny and the other one wants to know who's been talking about us:rotfl:

Seriously, regarding the serious part of your post, there would still be some flap from some religious groups, but nowhere near the flap that dollars and religion together can cause.