PDA

View Full Version : Old Small Split Freighter...and...


Seminole
08-10-08, 09:25 PM
....small split freighter. The images in the Recognition Manual are exactly the same , but the mast height is 87.9 for the former and only 74 for the latter. (Think stadimeter.)

I did several searches which turned up nothing about this. ..though I did run across an old thread claiming to know why they are named split...with a photo showing one blown in half...:lol:..good for a laugh.

So..how do you tell them apart? Or do you not care and use either the accuracy fix mod or auto targeting?

Sailor Steve
08-10-08, 10:51 PM
Yep. Same for Small Composite and Coastal Composite, both 1850 tons. One mast is 74 feet and the other is 72 feet. Exact same picture.

I have no idea.

Seminole
08-11-08, 07:55 AM
1. You are right about the costal
2. me neither

LukeFF
08-11-08, 04:20 PM
One is used for the Japanese and one for the Allies. Why they have two different mast heights is a mystery. They are the exact same model and share the same damage model.

Seminole
08-11-08, 04:34 PM
OK. Sounds reasonable. Which is the Japanese one? The taller mast or lower?

LukeFF
08-11-08, 04:35 PM
OK. Sounds reasonable. Which is the Japanese one? The taller mast or lower?

As I recall, it's the Small Old Split Freighter.

Orion2012
08-11-08, 09:49 PM
I know this point has been made before, but inaccurate mast heights being inaccurate are kinda historically accurate. I dont think the Japanese let us climb there masts with our official U.S. Navy tape measure. I personally think that being off a foot or 2 is okay, but then again the same model is used so the guessed estimate should be the same. :damn:

Kind of a conundrum...

Seminole
08-12-08, 07:16 AM
1. It is not a couple of feet it is 13.9 :yep:

2.We aren't planning solutions in that real , past world. However, we are in this computerized version of it where lets face it..size matters. ;)

Mush Martin
08-12-08, 07:39 AM
Funnel height v mast height ? in one v the other

Not sure but maybe one got done and the other
didnt somehow.

Orion2012
08-12-08, 03:31 PM
1. It is not a couple of feet it is 13.9 :yep:

2.We aren't planning solutions in that real , past world. However, we are in this computerized version of it where lets face it..size matters. ;)


:rotfl: