Log in

View Full Version : Extra Subs: A poll....


IrischKapitan
07-08-07, 06:05 PM
Well I was just thinking about some extra Subs they should add to GWX.....
And then the idea hit me!!! What about Itialian boats and english boats and other nationalities subs........... :hmm::hmm:

bookworm_020
07-08-07, 06:37 PM
It would be nice to have extra subs in the game, I do believe they are trying to put some more in for the final update of GWX.

The biggest problem is the fact that they can't make them dive like playable subs due to codeing issues.

The fact they have already put AI subs in the game on both sides is a big achivement and they deserve praise just for that alone.:rock:

TarJak
07-08-07, 09:00 PM
The SHIII engine lets you put an AI sub in but only either surfaced or submerged. Unfortunately the starting depth is where it stays until it gets sunk...:damn:

WilhelmSchulz.
07-09-07, 12:40 AM
Your wish is my command

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=116843

Kpt. Lehmann
07-09-07, 11:00 AM
LOL.

LMAO.

LMFAO.

BWAHHHhhaahahahahahahahaaaaaaaa!!!

BWAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaa!!!

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/KptLehmann/darthv.jpg

...and old man riverrrr.... just keeps on rollinnnn...

ichso
07-09-07, 12:24 PM
If someone wants to put much work into the creation of an additional submarine, that's fine.
But I doubt that it is really necessary as you hardly see one in an actual career play. At least I haven't seen much subs around away from my home port :roll:

danlisa
07-09-07, 12:33 PM
LOL, this poll is too funny.:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
:arrgh!:

Ahem, back to work.:roll:

Kpt. Lehmann
07-09-07, 12:35 PM
If someone wants to put much work into the creation of an additional submarine, that's fine.
But I doubt that it is really necessary as you hardly see one in an actual career play. At least I haven't seen much subs around away from my home port :roll:

Well, if you saw everything all at once... all of the time. What on the planet would be left to surprise you on occasion. :roll:

I guess its a good thing that we march to our own drummers.

papa_smurf
07-09-07, 01:24 PM
Would be nice to have more subs, and make it possible for AI subs to submerge. Not sure if that would be possible

bigboywooly
07-09-07, 01:37 PM
Would be nice to have more subs, and make it possible for AI subs to submerge. Not sure if that would be possible

Well you will be spoilt in GWX 1.04 then
No its not possible to make subs submerge or surface
If a sub is surfaced it stays that way
Not a lot we can do about that

papa_smurf
07-09-07, 01:41 PM
No its not possible to make subs submerge or surface
If a sub is surfaced it stays that way
Not a lot we can do about that


Wishfull thinking on my part............:damn:

Iron Budokan
07-09-07, 02:35 PM
I be honest, I think there's enough already.

ichso
07-09-07, 03:04 PM
Especially with the very cool XXIII by flakmonkey and the one that you can already sneak peak in GWX 1.04 :)

Jimbuna
07-09-07, 04:48 PM
ROTFLMAO :rotfl: :rotfl:

WilhelmSchulz.
07-09-07, 06:11 PM
Especially with the very cool XXIII by flakmonkey....
That would be nice.

IrischKapitan
07-10-07, 02:49 PM
The little type 23 is coming to GWX!!!

I would love to see that....
(Plus a 9 seconds sive time would be handy:arrgh!:)

bigboywooly
07-10-07, 03:11 PM
AI boats dont dive

JU_88
09-27-07, 07:22 PM
As above - other nations subs have been added to 1.04, those who think there enough subs already in 1.03 - give me a break, are you telling me you'd rather see yet another four merchant types instead?? :rotfl:
No offence but lets have abit of variety here -if you dont mind!
I know you hardly ever see subs on patrol, but you hardly ever see battleships either, doesnt mean they dont matter!
Anyway, take a way those rare encounters and every patrol is rather repetative.. merchant/escort/merchant/escort/merchant/escort/.... a bit predictable dont you think?
I dunno, Is it just me - or after you have sunk a Large Cargo for the millionth time, you kinda want to engage somthing else for a change.

Its a shame about the limited behavior of Ai subs, but dispite this they deserve to be represented, why? because they were there - around 15 Uboats were sunk by them.

Capt. Shark Bait
09-27-07, 07:28 PM
went for broke; all of the above:ping:

andylegate
09-27-07, 09:20 PM
I've seen several of the "S" class subs in GWX 1.03. Bad little boogers too! Don't let them start shooting their deck gun at you, their good! :o
Mostly I've seen them with a convoy, specifically down in the CF area in late 1940 and in 41. I'm sure they are every where though!

I've yet to have a torp shot at me, thank goodness! :eek:

Hitman
09-28-07, 06:36 AM
Not sure if the poll meant that also, but I'd like to see the nearly useless Type IIA replaced by Flakmonkey's Type XXIII beautiful sub as a PLAYABLE player sub :up: Leaving the same interiors of the Type II would be OK, just changing the external model and the performance and allowing the XXI Flotilla to assign you one in 1945 :rock:

Dowly
09-28-07, 06:59 AM
WHAT DID YOU CALL THE IIA!? http://futuramasutra.babytux.de/images/fanmade/scans/bender-angry.gif

Jimbuna
09-28-07, 07:31 AM
It wasn't that bad Dowly :nope:

Remember....there's a 'use' in the word 'useless' :lol:

bigboywooly
09-28-07, 07:41 AM
He only gets like that as it the only Finnish contribution
To anything

LMFAO
Joke my little ferret

panzer 49th
09-28-07, 07:42 AM
WHAT DID YOU CALL THE IIA!? http://futuramasutra.babytux.de/images/fanmade/scans/bender-angry.gif

Oh no looks like you have unleashed the power of the DOWLY lol

U49
09-28-07, 08:20 AM
I took "all of above".

I'm still dreaming of ripping a convoy into peaces like I did with AOD with up to 7 uboats with me. But since I sunk me first enemy sub with GWX 1.03 I'm keen on seeing and identifying (and maybe sinking :-) each new sub contact

Hitman
09-28-07, 01:53 PM
WHAT DID YOU CALL THE IIA!?

Errrrr I meant that lovely masterpiece of technique that distinguised herself proudly carrying the weigth of the U-Boat campaign in the first months of war, and had previously served so well in the Baltic sea under the always skilled, fearless and gallant finnish hands.:roll:

But can someone please replace it with the XXIII????? :arrgh!:

Jimbuna
09-28-07, 01:55 PM
WHAT DID YOU CALL THE IIA!?

Errrrr I meant that lovely masterpiece of technique that distinguised herself proudly carrying the weigth of the U-Boat campaign in the first months of war, and had previously served so well in the Baltic sea under the always skilled, fearless and gallant finnish hands.:roll:

But can someone please replace it with the XXIII????? :arrgh!:

LMAO :rotfl:

AdlerGrosmann
10-24-07, 05:55 PM
Hmm barely see Japanese ships....maybe they should put some Japanese submarines in there then?:smug:

Kaleu. Jochen Mohr
10-28-07, 08:54 PM
Hmm barely see Japanese ships....maybe they should put some Japanese submarines in there then?:smug:

there is one :yep:
can give you a link if you want

AdlerGrosmann
10-28-07, 09:04 PM
Alright I would like to have it!:arrgh!: So I can see what Yamamato is up to!:smug:

Stealth Hunter
10-28-07, 09:52 PM
We need MORE.:stare:

I've sunk over a dozen! PASSION NOT SATISFIED!! MORE! MORE! MORE!!

Kaleu. Jochen Mohr
10-29-07, 05:38 AM
We need MORE.:stare:

I've sunk over a dozen! PASSION NOT SATISFIED!! MORE! MORE! MORE!!

what he said :yep:

AdlerGrosmann
10-29-07, 07:47 AM
We need MORE.:stare:

I've sunk over a dozen! PASSION NOT SATISFIED!! MORE! MORE! MORE!!

what he said :yep: Yes..what he said!:smug:

Bismarck
10-31-07, 11:06 AM
We need MORE.:stare:

I've sunk over a dozen! PASSION NOT SATISFIED!! MORE! MORE! MORE!!

what he said :yep: Yes..what he said!:smug:

Don't forget me. I want some. :know: